Frontiers in immunology · 2025
Natalizumab and fumarate treatment differentially modulate CD4+ T cell and B cell subtypes in multiple sclerosis patients without impacting durable COVID-19 vaccine responses.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Curtin Ryan, Velmurugu Yogambigai, Dibba Fatoumatta, Hao Yuan, Nyovanie Samantha, Lopez Andrea, Mieles David, Ng Courtney, Perdomo Katherine, Scott Nicole, Lewin James B, Avila Robin L, Smrtka Jen, Patskovsky Yury, Howard Jonathan, Silverman Gregg J, Krogsgaard Michelle
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a greater risk of complications from severe COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) treated with certain disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), as well as a diminished vaccine response.
METHODS: In this exploratory, observational study, we recruited 28 patients with Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS, n=24) or Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS, n=4), that were receiving treatment with either natalizumab or fumarates (diroximel or dimethyl) prior to baseline sample collection. Blood samples were collected before vaccination (baseline), between 4 weeks and 6 months post vaccination, and post booster administration. A multiplex bead immunoassay (MBI) was used to measure anti-Spike IgG, while IFNγ and IL-2 ELISpot assays were used to determine T cell activation. A 35-color spectral flow cytometry panel was used to phenotype bulk B and T cells and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, while dimensionality reduction was performed for further phenotypic analysis.
RESULTS: We observed a significantly increased absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) (p=0.0003) in natalizumab-treated pwMS when compared to fumarate-treated pwMS primarily due to increased circulating CD19+ B cells. Fumarate-treated pwMS exhibited a diminished Th1/Th2 ratio when compared to natalizumab-treated pwMS (p=0.0004) or healthy controls (p=0.0745), while natalizumab treatment marginally increased the Th1/Th2 ratio compared to healthy controls (p=0.1311). The observed increase in B cells in natalizumab-treated pwMS were predominantly memory B cells, and double negative (DN) B cells. However, no significant differences between the treatment groups were seen in terms of Spike IgG titers following the initial vaccination course or booster dose, nor in SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ responses, all of which remained robust for at least 6 months post-vaccination. The magnitude of humoral and cellular immune responses in both treatment groups were comparable to vaccinated healthy controls. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ T cell phenotyping revealed a Th2 dominant response to booster dose in natalizumab-treated pwMS (p=0.0485) but not fumarate-treated pwMS.
CONCLUSION: pwMS treated with natalizumab or fumarates exhibit similarly robust and durable SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell and humoral responses following vaccination and booster dose. DMT-treated pwMS showing comparable responses to healthy individuals following initial vaccination supports the notion that treatment with these specific DMTs does not diminish strong, long-lasting immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination, despite the phenotypic differences modulated by each therapy.
METHODS: In this exploratory, observational study, we recruited 28 patients with Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS, n=24) or Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS, n=4), that were receiving treatment with either natalizumab or fumarates (diroximel or dimethyl) prior to baseline sample collection. Blood samples were collected before vaccination (baseline), between 4 weeks and 6 months post vaccination, and post booster administration. A multiplex bead immunoassay (MBI) was used to measure anti-Spike IgG, while IFNγ and IL-2 ELISpot assays were used to determine T cell activation. A 35-color spectral flow cytometry panel was used to phenotype bulk B and T cells and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, while dimensionality reduction was performed for further phenotypic analysis.
RESULTS: We observed a significantly increased absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) (p=0.0003) in natalizumab-treated pwMS when compared to fumarate-treated pwMS primarily due to increased circulating CD19+ B cells. Fumarate-treated pwMS exhibited a diminished Th1/Th2 ratio when compared to natalizumab-treated pwMS (p=0.0004) or healthy controls (p=0.0745), while natalizumab treatment marginally increased the Th1/Th2 ratio compared to healthy controls (p=0.1311). The observed increase in B cells in natalizumab-treated pwMS were predominantly memory B cells, and double negative (DN) B cells. However, no significant differences between the treatment groups were seen in terms of Spike IgG titers following the initial vaccination course or booster dose, nor in SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ responses, all of which remained robust for at least 6 months post-vaccination. The magnitude of humoral and cellular immune responses in both treatment groups were comparable to vaccinated healthy controls. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ T cell phenotyping revealed a Th2 dominant response to booster dose in natalizumab-treated pwMS (p=0.0485) but not fumarate-treated pwMS.
CONCLUSION: pwMS treated with natalizumab or fumarates exhibit similarly robust and durable SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell and humoral responses following vaccination and booster dose. DMT-treated pwMS showing comparable responses to healthy individuals following initial vaccination supports the notion that treatment with these specific DMTs does not diminish strong, long-lasting immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination, despite the phenotypic differences modulated by each therapy.