MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/14604582251363510

Медицинская библиотека · Health informatics journal · 2025

Application of machine learning algorithm for the prediction of lupus nephritis using SNP data, polygenic risk score, and electronic health record.

Chung Chih-Wei, Chou Seng-Cho, Kao Chung-Mao, Chen Yen-Ju, Hsiao Tzu-Hung, Chen Yi-Ming

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) flares raise the risks of renal failure and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, making risk stratification and individualized care crucial. Our goal was to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict LN flares.

METHODS

A total of 1546 SLE patients were enrolled from a hospital-based cohort. Electronic health record (EHR), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and polygenic risk score (PRS) were combined to construct ML models. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values were calculated to assess each feature's contribution.

RESULTS

Within 5 years, 448 patients developed LN. Of the 686,354 SNPs, 375 were used for PRS computation. The model combining EHR, SNP, and PRS achieved the highest AUROC of 0.9512 and AUPRC of 0.8902 in validation, while the XGB-based hybrid model reached an AUPRC of 0.9021 in testing. The SHAP summary plot highlighted the top 20 features predicting LN flares.

CONCLUSIONS

This hybrid model combining SNP, PRS, and EHR predicts active LN and requires validation.

Для цитирования: Chung Chih-Wei, Chou Seng-Cho, Kao Chung-Mao, Chen Yen-Ju, Hsiao Tzu-Hung, Chen Yi-Ming. Application of machine learning algorithm for the prediction of lupus nephritis using SNP data, polygenic risk score, and electronic health record.. Health informatics journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/14604582251363510.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.