Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery · 2014
3D atlas-based registration can calculate malalignment of femoral shaft fractures in six degrees of freedom.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Crookshank Meghan C, Beek Maarten, Hardisty Michael R, Schemitsch Emil H, Whyne Cari M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study presents and evaluates a semi-automated algorithm for quantifying malalignment in complex femoral shaft fractures from a single intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) image of the fractured limb.
METHODS: CBCT images were acquired of complex comminuted diaphyseal fractures created in 9 cadaveric femora (27 cases). Scans were segmented using intensity-based thresholding, yielding image stacks of the proximal, distal and comminuted bone. Semi-deformable and rigid affine registrations to an intact femur atlas (synthetic or cadaveric-based) were performed to transform the distal fragment to its neutral alignment. Leg length was calculated from the volume of bone within the comminution fragment. The transformations were compared to the physical input malalignments.
RESULTS: Using the synthetic atlas, translations were within 1.71 ± 1.08 mm (medial/lateral) and 2.24 ± 2.11 mm (anterior/posterior). The varus/valgus, flexion/extension and periaxial rotation errors were 3.45 ± 2.6°, 1.86 ± 1.5° and 3.4 ± 2.0°, respectively. The cadaveric-based atlas yielded similar results in medial/lateral and anterior/posterior translation (1.73 ± 1.28 mm and 2.15 ± 2.13 mm, respectively). Varus/valgus, flexion/extension and periaxial rotation errors were 2.3 ± 1.3°, 2.0 ± 1.6° and 3.4 ± 2.0°, respectively. Leg length errors were 1.41 ± 1.01 mm (synthetic) and 1.26 ± 0.94 mm (cadaveric). The cadaveric model demonstrated a small improvement in flexion/extension and the synthetic atlas performed slightly faster (6 min 24 s ± 50 s versus 8 min 42 s ± 2 min 25 s).
CONCLUSIONS: This atlas-based algorithm quantified malalignment in complex femoral shaft fractures within clinical tolerances from a single CBCT image of the fractured limb.
METHODS: CBCT images were acquired of complex comminuted diaphyseal fractures created in 9 cadaveric femora (27 cases). Scans were segmented using intensity-based thresholding, yielding image stacks of the proximal, distal and comminuted bone. Semi-deformable and rigid affine registrations to an intact femur atlas (synthetic or cadaveric-based) were performed to transform the distal fragment to its neutral alignment. Leg length was calculated from the volume of bone within the comminution fragment. The transformations were compared to the physical input malalignments.
RESULTS: Using the synthetic atlas, translations were within 1.71 ± 1.08 mm (medial/lateral) and 2.24 ± 2.11 mm (anterior/posterior). The varus/valgus, flexion/extension and periaxial rotation errors were 3.45 ± 2.6°, 1.86 ± 1.5° and 3.4 ± 2.0°, respectively. The cadaveric-based atlas yielded similar results in medial/lateral and anterior/posterior translation (1.73 ± 1.28 mm and 2.15 ± 2.13 mm, respectively). Varus/valgus, flexion/extension and periaxial rotation errors were 2.3 ± 1.3°, 2.0 ± 1.6° and 3.4 ± 2.0°, respectively. Leg length errors were 1.41 ± 1.01 mm (synthetic) and 1.26 ± 0.94 mm (cadaveric). The cadaveric model demonstrated a small improvement in flexion/extension and the synthetic atlas performed slightly faster (6 min 24 s ± 50 s versus 8 min 42 s ± 2 min 25 s).
CONCLUSIONS: This atlas-based algorithm quantified malalignment in complex femoral shaft fractures within clinical tolerances from a single CBCT image of the fractured limb.