World neurosurgery · 2019
Stent Screw-Assisted Internal Fixation (SAIF) of Severe Lytic Spinal Metastases: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis of the SAIF Technique.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
La Barbera Luigi, Cianfoni Alessandro, Ferrari Andrea, Distefano Daniela, Bonaldi Giuseppe, Villa Tomaso
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: A new stent-screw-assisted internal fixation (SAIF) minimally invasive cement-augmentation technique has been introduced to treat patients with extreme osteolytic lesions of the vertebral body. The aim of the current finite element study, employing a spine model with an extreme osteolytic defect, was to assess the effect of the SAIF technique in reducing strains in the vertebral body in comparison with a standard surgical short posterior fixation.
METHODS: Different finite element models of a L1-S1 spine were developed, representing an intact condition (reference configuration), an extreme osteolysis condition, and its treatment, respectively with stand-alone SAIF, SAIF and posterior fixation, and with stand-alone posterior fixation. Each model was loaded to reproduce standing and upper body bending. Principal strains were calculated on the superior endplate, anterior and posterior cortical walls. A paired Wilcoxon test with a 0.05 significance level was performed to statistically analyze the results.
RESULTS: Median strains on the bony structures increased in the osteolysis model compared with the intact model, and the SAIF technique was effective in reducing such strains under both standing and flexion conditions. Additional posterior fixation, combined with the SAIF technique, produced minimal further reduction of the median strains on the bony structures. Stand-alone posterior fixation only shielded the osteolytic vertebra avoiding excessive displacements but failed in restoring the axial stiffness to values typical of the intact vertebra.
CONCLUSIONS: The new SAIF technique resulted effective in restoring the load-bearing capacity of the extensively osteolytic vertebra; additional posterior fixation provided only further minor advantages.
METHODS: Different finite element models of a L1-S1 spine were developed, representing an intact condition (reference configuration), an extreme osteolysis condition, and its treatment, respectively with stand-alone SAIF, SAIF and posterior fixation, and with stand-alone posterior fixation. Each model was loaded to reproduce standing and upper body bending. Principal strains were calculated on the superior endplate, anterior and posterior cortical walls. A paired Wilcoxon test with a 0.05 significance level was performed to statistically analyze the results.
RESULTS: Median strains on the bony structures increased in the osteolysis model compared with the intact model, and the SAIF technique was effective in reducing such strains under both standing and flexion conditions. Additional posterior fixation, combined with the SAIF technique, produced minimal further reduction of the median strains on the bony structures. Stand-alone posterior fixation only shielded the osteolytic vertebra avoiding excessive displacements but failed in restoring the axial stiffness to values typical of the intact vertebra.
CONCLUSIONS: The new SAIF technique resulted effective in restoring the load-bearing capacity of the extensively osteolytic vertebra; additional posterior fixation provided only further minor advantages.