A performance validation of six commercial wrist-worn wearable sleep-tracking devices for sleep stage scoring compared to polysomnography.

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the performance of six different consumer wearable sleep-tracking devices, namely the Fitbit Charge 5, Fitbit Sense, Withings Scanwatch, Garmin Vivosmart 4, Whoop 4.0, and the Apple Watch Series 8, for detecting sleep parameters compared to the gold standard, polysomnography (PSG).

METHODS

Sixty-two adults (52 males and 10 females, mean age ± SD = 46.0 ± 12.6 years) spent a single night in the sleep laboratory with PSG while simultaneously using two to four wearable devices.

RESULTS

The results indicate that most wearables displayed significant differences with PSG for total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and light sleep (LS). Nevertheless, all wearables demonstrated a higher percentage of correctly identified epochs for deep sleep and rapid eye movement sleep compared to wake (W) and LS. All devices detected >90% of sleep epochs (ie, sensitivity), but showed lower specificity (29.39%-52.15%). The Cohen's kappa coefficients of the wearable devices ranged from 0.21 to 0.53, indicating fair to moderate agreement with PSG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that all devices can benefit from further improvement for multistate categorization. However, the devices with higher Cohen's kappa coefficients, such as the Fitbit Sense (κ = 0.42), Fitbit Charge 5 (κ = 0.41), and Apple Watch Series 8 (κ = 0.53), could be effectively used to track prolonged and significant changes in sleep architecture.