BMJ neurology open · 2025
Different patterns of fasciculation in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a muscle ultrasonographic study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nara Takeru, Shibuya Kazumoto, Ikeda Shinobu, Kuroiwa Ryota, Otani Ryo, Ogushi Moeko, Suichi Tomoki, Shiko Yuki, Takahashi Kohei, Misawa Sonoko, Murata Astushi, Kuwabara Satoshi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of muscle ultrasonography for detection of fasciculations has been increasingly recognised, particularly in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to elucidate distributions and characteristics of fasciculations in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) and to compare the results of those in ALS.
METHODS: In 24 SBMA and 16 ALS patients, muscle ultrasonography was systematically performed in the tongue, upper limb muscles (biceps brachii, triceps brachii, first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi), trunk muscles (Th10 paraspinals and rectus abdominis) and lower limb muscles (vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius). We assessed the presence of fasciculations and the fasciculation intensity (scored from 0 to 3) for each muscle.
RESULTS: All SBMA and ALS patients showed fasciculations at least in two muscles. In SBMA patients, fasciculations were most frequently found in the tongue (100%), FDI (93%) and tibialis anterior (80%), whereas less frequently present in the proximal limb and trunk muscles, irrespective of age, disease duration and CAG repeat numbers. By contrast, in ALS patients, fasciculations were more diffusely distributed including the proximal limb and trunk muscles. When fasciculations were present, the intensity was higher in ALS patients, except for the tongue.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas both diseases exhibit extensive fasciculations, the distribution and intensity are different. SBMA is characterised by prominent involvement in the tongue and distal limb muscles, suggesting different pathophysiology of motor neuronal death in SBMA and ALS.
METHODS: In 24 SBMA and 16 ALS patients, muscle ultrasonography was systematically performed in the tongue, upper limb muscles (biceps brachii, triceps brachii, first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi), trunk muscles (Th10 paraspinals and rectus abdominis) and lower limb muscles (vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius). We assessed the presence of fasciculations and the fasciculation intensity (scored from 0 to 3) for each muscle.
RESULTS: All SBMA and ALS patients showed fasciculations at least in two muscles. In SBMA patients, fasciculations were most frequently found in the tongue (100%), FDI (93%) and tibialis anterior (80%), whereas less frequently present in the proximal limb and trunk muscles, irrespective of age, disease duration and CAG repeat numbers. By contrast, in ALS patients, fasciculations were more diffusely distributed including the proximal limb and trunk muscles. When fasciculations were present, the intensity was higher in ALS patients, except for the tongue.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas both diseases exhibit extensive fasciculations, the distribution and intensity are different. SBMA is characterised by prominent involvement in the tongue and distal limb muscles, suggesting different pathophysiology of motor neuronal death in SBMA and ALS.