[Tomodensitometric image of the lumbar spine. Study of 150 patients hospitalized for discal sciatica].

OBJECTIVES

There would be some discordance between patient expectations and expert recommendations concerning computed tomography (CT) of the spine for discal disorders. We analyzed patient opinion.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

At admission, a 25-item questionnaire was given to 150 patients hospitalized in a rheumatology unit for discal sciatica. Patients were asked to express their expectations concerning the CT exploration.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of the patients had already undergone CT explorations requested by a general practitioner (55%) or a specialist (45%), 20% had had two CT explorations and 20% magnetic resonance imaging. Seventy-five percent felt they should have had a CT scan earlier, 85% thought a CT should be performed for back pain of less than one month duration and 96% in case of sciatica for 2 months or more. Patients felt their exploration came "late" because the physician was under financial pressure (52%), had incorrectly appreciated the patient's need (28%) or was incompetent in the matter (22%). Nevertheless, 15% of the patients recognized that the CT scan could be useless and 89% knew that all cases of hernia are not operable. Thirty percent recognized that hernias can go undetected on the CT scan and 78% that they may remain asymptomatic. Finally, 56% of the patients thought that the CT scan would not change their treatment and only 23% expected to undergo surgery sooner because of the CT exploration.

DISCUSSION: Several factors would explain what patients expect from CT exploration of the spine: patient understanding that causes other than discal hernia can cause back pain (98%) or sciatic (77%); their fear of having another disorder (56% wanted to be reassured, which would explain in part why 27% hoped the CT would improve pain, 50% wanted to "see" their discal hernia, and 30 wanted to eliminate another cause of their pain); patient distrust of clinical diagnosis which they felt was less pertinent than CT (80% of the patients for generalists and 70% for specialists). Patient expectations did not appear to be limited by fear of irradiation (unrecognized by 90% of the patients) nor the cost of the exploration which was overestimated by 70% of them.