Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2025
Advantages of cemented stems in facilitating early postoperative rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ishikura Hisatoshi, Nishiwaki Toru, Masuyama Yuji, Fujita Sho, Hatano Masaki, Tanaka Takeyuki, Tanaka Sakae
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study examined whether cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) accelerate postoperative rehabilitation compared to cementless stems, even in patients with osteoporosis.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 232 unilateral THAs included cemented (n = 84) and cementless (n = 148) groups. Propensity score matching yielded 53 matched pairs. Outcomes included rehabilitation milestones (initiation of T-cane walking, stable ambulation, and stair climbing), length of hospital stay, and clinical scores. Perioperative parameters, such as operative time, blood loss, and pain scores were also assessed.
RESULTS: The cemented group achieved earlier initiation (4.2 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 days, respectively; p < 0.05) and stabilisation (5.3 ± 3.1 vs. 6.6 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.05) of T-cane walking compared to the cementless group. No significant differences were observed in stair-climbing time or length of hospital stay. Despite greater intraoperative blood loss in the cemented group, the estimated total and postoperative blood losses were comparable. Both groups showed similar improvements in clinical scores over 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Cemented stems facilitated earlier ambulation without compromising long-term outcomes, supporting their use in osteoporotic patients for early postoperative recovery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 232 unilateral THAs included cemented (n = 84) and cementless (n = 148) groups. Propensity score matching yielded 53 matched pairs. Outcomes included rehabilitation milestones (initiation of T-cane walking, stable ambulation, and stair climbing), length of hospital stay, and clinical scores. Perioperative parameters, such as operative time, blood loss, and pain scores were also assessed.
RESULTS: The cemented group achieved earlier initiation (4.2 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 days, respectively; p < 0.05) and stabilisation (5.3 ± 3.1 vs. 6.6 ± 3.4 days, p < 0.05) of T-cane walking compared to the cementless group. No significant differences were observed in stair-climbing time or length of hospital stay. Despite greater intraoperative blood loss in the cemented group, the estimated total and postoperative blood losses were comparable. Both groups showed similar improvements in clinical scores over 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Cemented stems facilitated earlier ambulation without compromising long-term outcomes, supporting their use in osteoporotic patients for early postoperative recovery.