MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101623

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2004

Unilateral cervical facet fracture: presentation of two cases and literature review.

Kalayci M, Cağavi F, Açikgöz B

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Two patients with diagnosis of unilateral cervical facet fracture due to motor vehicle accident (MVA) are presented, and the literature is reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the diagnostic difficulties and management strategies in two patients with post-traumatic cervical facet fracture.

SETTING

Department of Neurosurgery, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.

SUBJECT: Nonoperative treatment with immobilization was preferred in two female cases (33-34 years old) with diagnosis of C6-7 facet fracture following MVA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be performed in acute period in the first case, but not in the second because of inadequate technical condition.

RESULT: The first case with a good compliance to immobilization recovered without any neurological complication. However, the second case mobilized earlier and used a collar irregularly. Instability developed in the second case on the second month and surgical intervention with anterior approach was performed.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of unilateral facet fractures is often missed and the treatment is still controversial. The compliance of the patient to cervical immobilization in nonoperative treatment plays a very important role in the development of late complications. MRI in the acute period may be useful in determining instability.

Для цитирования: Kalayci M, Cağavi F, Açikgöz B. Unilateral cervical facet fracture: presentation of two cases and literature review.. Spinal cord. 2004. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101623.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.