MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12098-016-2270-4

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of pediatrics · 2016

Heterogeneous Diagnoses Underlying Radial Ray Anomalies.

Sevilla-Montoya Rosalba, Aguinaga Mónica, Martínez Alejandro, Razo Guadalupe, Molina Bertha, Frías Sara, Grether Patricia

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To review perinatal Radial Ray Anomaly (RRA) cases born at the National Institute of Perinatology, Mexico, and to reveal the heterogeneous diagnoses of these patients.

METHODS

All patients with RRA over a 18 mo period were included; 4/15 were detected prenatally and 11/15 postnatally. Karyotype was performed for all patients with bilateral RRA; and chromosomal breakage analysis, when the karyotype was normal.

RESULTS

Fifteen RRA patients were identified: one with trisomy 18, three with an isolated defect, six with monogenic disease, four with a genetic association and one with diabetic embryopathy. Five were stillborn and two died during the early neonatal period; all of whom presented with multiple defects. Three of the live born patients and one stillborn with multiple defects had Fanconi anemia. RRAs carry a high perinatal mortality rate (47%) when they occur in association with other defects.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of these patients needs to involve the combined use of ultrasound, clinical, genetic, cytogenetic and molecular testing. The present results indicate that the chromosome breakage test should always be performed to rule out Fanconi anemia in this group.

Для цитирования: Sevilla-Montoya Rosalba, Aguinaga Mónica, Martínez Alejandro, Razo Guadalupe, Molina Bertha, Frías Sara, Grether Patricia. Heterogeneous Diagnoses Underlying Radial Ray Anomalies.. Indian journal of pediatrics. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-016-2270-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.