Prevalence, pattern, and spectrum of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation: CT analysis of 218 patients.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence, pattern, and spectrum of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation, to relate this to the frequency of dislocation, and to test the appropriateness of the measurement method.
SUBJECTS AND
METHODS
Two hundred eighteen patients with single or recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation underwent shoulder CT examination. Fifteen patients had bilateral dislocation. Prevalence and severity of glenoid bone loss and glenoid fracture were assessed. CT examinations of 56 control subjects without shoulder dislocation were evaluated for glenoid contour and side-to-side variation in glenoid width.
RESULTS
Glenoid bone loss was present in 27 (41%) of 66 patients with first-time unilateral dislocation and 118 (86%) of 137 patients with recurrent unilateral dislocation. Glenoid bone loss ranged from -0.3% to -33% (mean, -10.8% +/- 7.9%). Seventy-four (51%) of 145 patients had < or = 10% glenoid bone loss, 54 (37%) had between 10% and 20%, eight (6%) had between 20% and 25% glenoid bone loss, and nine (6%) had > or = 25% glenoid bone loss. Glenoid rim fractures were present in 49 (21%) of 233 dislocated shoulders. The number of dislocations correlated moderately with the severity of glenoid bone loss (r = 0.56). The normal side-to-side glenoid width variation was small (0.46 +/- 0.81 mm).
CONCLUSION
Glenoid bone loss is common in anterior shoulder dislocation. It is probably multifactorial in origin, is usually mild in degree, and has a maximum observed severity of -33%. Dislocation frequency cannot accurately predict the degree of bone loss.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.