MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet · 2007

Lumbar disc degeneration in Thai elderly: a population-based study.

Chaiwanichsiri Dootchai, Jiamworakul Araya, Jitapunkul Sutthichai

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Determine the prevalence and related factors of lumbar disc degeneration in the Thai elderly.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: A population-based study was done at Rom Klao community, Bangkok. Seven hundred and ninety-two cases (306 males, and 486 females) out of 1166 elderly people aged > or =50 (mean age of 61.07 +/- 7.8 years) were assessed. The lateral spinal radiographs were interpreted as spondylosis grade 0-3 according to the degree of severity.

RESULTS

Males had more prevalence of grade 2-3 spondylosis than females (58.8% vs. 52.9%), but females had higher prevalence of spinal listhesis (14.4% vs. 8.8%). Age was a strong predicting factor for disc degeneration (OR = 1.088, 95% CI = 1.065-1.111, p = 0.000). Females had more risk to develop spinal listhesis (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.11-3.05, p = 0.020) and low back pain (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.29-2.56, p = 0.001). BMI was a predicting factor for spondylosis (OR = 1.066, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10, p = 0.000). About 27% of the cases reported moderate-severe low back pain and had lower Barthel ADL index (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain were highly prevalent among the Thai elderly. Therefore, they need proper health care for disability prevention.

Для цитирования: Chaiwanichsiri Dootchai, Jiamworakul Araya, Jitapunkul Sutthichai. Lumbar disc degeneration in Thai elderly: a population-based study.. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.