International orthopaedics · 2012
Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krause Matthias, Breer Stefan, Hahn Michael, Rüther Wolfgang, Morlock Michael M, Amling Michael, Zustin Jozef
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The use of inappropriate cementation techniques has been suggested as an adverse factor for the long-term survival of hip-resurfacing arthroplasty. Inadequate initial fixation, thermal osteonecrosis and interface biological reactions are possible causes of failure. We analysed morphological changes associated with the cementation technique in a large collection of retrieved femoral components.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty femoral components (mean time to failure of 8.3 months±11.0) obtained at revision surgery were analysed morphometrically and histopathologically. Cement mantle and penetration were quantified in six different regions of interest. Histopathological analysis of the bone-cement interface was performed on undecalcified processed bone tissue.
RESULTS: The vast majority of the cases differed substantially from laboratory-based cement-penetration depth recommendations. Fifty-nine cases had a fibrous membrane at the cement-bone interface. This membrane was significantly thicker in cases with osteonecrosis compared to cases viable bone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that most failures were cemented inappropriately. We suggest that poor cementation was an important adverse factor; however, the cause of the failures was obviously multifactorial. The thickness of the fibrous membrane at the cement-bone interface differed significantly between cases with osteonecrosis and specimens with viable bone tissue.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty femoral components (mean time to failure of 8.3 months±11.0) obtained at revision surgery were analysed morphometrically and histopathologically. Cement mantle and penetration were quantified in six different regions of interest. Histopathological analysis of the bone-cement interface was performed on undecalcified processed bone tissue.
RESULTS: The vast majority of the cases differed substantially from laboratory-based cement-penetration depth recommendations. Fifty-nine cases had a fibrous membrane at the cement-bone interface. This membrane was significantly thicker in cases with osteonecrosis compared to cases viable bone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that most failures were cemented inappropriately. We suggest that poor cementation was an important adverse factor; however, the cause of the failures was obviously multifactorial. The thickness of the fibrous membrane at the cement-bone interface differed significantly between cases with osteonecrosis and specimens with viable bone tissue.