DOI 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11541
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Hands-On Simulation Case for Internal Medicine Residents Improves Knowledge and Confidence.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding leads to approximately 350,000 hospital admissions annually. Simulation-based training enhances medical education by improving quality care, patient safety, and clinical competency. To increase internal medicine (IM) residents' exposure to critical GI concepts, we developed a GI bleed simulation curriculum.
METHODS
A total of 129 IM residents participated in a hands-on simulation using a high-fidelity manikin. Pre- and postsimulation surveys assessed demographics, confidence, and knowledge. The case involved a 45-year-old male with alcohol use disorder, hematemesis, and hemodynamic instability. Key learning outcomes included assessing vitals, performing a physical exam, initiating resuscitation, ordering appropriate medication, consulting GI, and creating a differential. Critical equipment included a code cart and moulage blood. A postsimulation debrief addressed the management of esophageal varices (EV), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), central venous access, massive transfusion protocol, and hemorrhagic shock.
RESULTS
Confidence improved for PGY 1 and PGY 2 residents in all categories (p < .05). PGY 3 residents increased their confidence managing EV (p = .03), PUD (p = .002), and outpatient EV (p = .003). PGY 1 and PGY 2 knowledge increased with treatment of nonvariceal GI bleeds (p < .001, p = .001). All residents increased in their knowledge of timing of endoscopy for EV bleeds (p < .001). Among all residents combined, there was an increase in knowledge of discharge medications for EV and PUD (p = .01).
DISCUSSION: A hands-on simulation curriculum positively impacted IM residents' confidence and knowledge in managing GI bleeds, highlighting its educational value.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.