MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4012/dmj.2024-080

Медицинская библиотека · Dental materials journal · 2024

A comparison of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed, milled, and conventional denture base resin materials.

Yu Hyeong-Ju, Kang You-Jung, Park Yeseul, Kim Hoon, Kim Jee-Hwan

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study investigated the mechanical properties of three denture base resin materials produced by three-dimensional (3D) printing (Group P), computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milling (Group M), and conventional (Group C) methods. Three-point flexural tests were performed before and after thermocycling treatment to evaluate the mechanical properties. Additionally, nanoindentation and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) were used to analyze the behavior of the materials. After flexural strength tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to evaluate the fracture cross-section. The results consistently showed that Group P exhibited significantly higher flexural strength and modulus regardless of thermocycling than Groups C and M (p<0.05), along with a higher storage modulus in DMA and greater resistance and resilience to nanoindentation deformation. SEM analysis showed that Group C had a relatively smooth cross-section, whereas Groups M and P had torn cross-sections. This study suggests that the 3D-printed material has suitable mechanical properties for hard dental prosthesis applications.

Для цитирования: Yu Hyeong-Ju, Kang You-Jung, Park Yeseul, Kim Hoon, Kim Jee-Hwan. A comparison of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed, milled, and conventional denture base resin materials.. Dental materials journal. 2024. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2024-080.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.