MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/prca.200700067

Медицинская библиотека · Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2007

Clinical proteomics in chronic inflammatory diseases: A review.

Bons Judith A P, van Dieijen-Visser Marja P, Wodzig Will K W H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

There is a need for better markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of chronic inflammatory diseases. Proteomic strategies can be helpful to detect new biomarkers. Proteomic analyses are performed to characterize the behaviour of the system rather than the behaviour of any single component. Since the genome has been unravelled, the proteome received more attention. Aim of this review was to focus on the use of different proteomics techniques to detect potential and/or common biomarkers in chronic inflammatory diseases. The identified and validated proteins detected in the different studies are compared and discussed to conclude if there are some common markers which can be used in the diagnosis and prognosis of the three chronic inflammatory diseases described in this study; multiple sclerosis, rheumatic diseases and lung inflammatory diseases. The heat shock protein family (hsp) was entitled as biomarkers with potential for further research in multiple sclerosis. Myeloid-related protein 8 (MRP-8) was found in three different rheumatoid arthritis (RA) studies with different sample materials and could be a potential marker for RA. α1-Antitrypsin was validated in two studies as a marker for sarcoidosis and α1-antitrypsin was also found to be a marker for cystic fibrosis (CF), together with myeloperoxidase and IgG.

Для цитирования: Bons Judith A P, van Dieijen-Visser Marja P, Wodzig Will K W H. Clinical proteomics in chronic inflammatory diseases: A review.. Proteomics. Clinical applications. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/prca.200700067.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.