MedElevator
Войти в исследования World journal of orthopedics · 2022
Higher cost of arthroplasty for hip fractures in patients transferred from outside hospitals vs primary emergency department presentation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haug Emanuel C, Pehlivan Hakan, Macdonell J Ryan, Novicoff Wendy, Browne James, Brown Thomas, Cui Quanjun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In 2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed bundled payments for hip fractures to improve the quality and decrease costs of care. Patients transferred from other facilities may be imposing a financial risk on the hospitals that accept these patients.
AIM: To determine the costs associated with patients that either presented to the emergency department or were transferred from another hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) with the diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring operative intervention.
METHODS: A retrospective single institution review was conducted for all arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2015. Inclusion criteria included a total or partial hip replacement for a hip fracture. Exclusion criteria included pathologic, periprosthetic, and fracture non-union. Data was collected to compare total observed costs for patients from the emergency department, patients from skilled nursing facilities, and patients from an outside hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria. 135 (60.54%) of these patients presented primarily to the emergency department, 58 patients (26.01%) were transferred from an outside hospital, and 30 patients (13.43%) were transferred from a SNF. Cost data analysis showed that outside hospital patients demonstrated significantly greater total cost for their hospitalization ($43302) compared to emergency department patients ($28875, P = 0.000) and SNF patients ($28282, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Patients transferred from an outside hospital incurred greater costs for their hospitalization than patients presenting from an emergency department or SNF. This is a strong argument for risk-adjustment models when bundling payments for the care of hip fracture patients.
AIM: To determine the costs associated with patients that either presented to the emergency department or were transferred from another hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) with the diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring operative intervention.
METHODS: A retrospective single institution review was conducted for all arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2015. Inclusion criteria included a total or partial hip replacement for a hip fracture. Exclusion criteria included pathologic, periprosthetic, and fracture non-union. Data was collected to compare total observed costs for patients from the emergency department, patients from skilled nursing facilities, and patients from an outside hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria. 135 (60.54%) of these patients presented primarily to the emergency department, 58 patients (26.01%) were transferred from an outside hospital, and 30 patients (13.43%) were transferred from a SNF. Cost data analysis showed that outside hospital patients demonstrated significantly greater total cost for their hospitalization ($43302) compared to emergency department patients ($28875, P = 0.000) and SNF patients ($28282, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Patients transferred from an outside hospital incurred greater costs for their hospitalization than patients presenting from an emergency department or SNF. This is a strong argument for risk-adjustment models when bundling payments for the care of hip fracture patients.