MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2298/vsp1310976v

Медицинская библиотека · Vojnosanitetski pregled · 2013

Listeria monocytogenes meningitis in an immunocompetent 18-year-old patient as a possible diagnostic and therapeutical problem.

Vrbić Miodrag, Dinić Marina, Jovanović Maja, Ranković Aleksandar, Popović-Dragonjić Lidija, Djordjević-Spasić Marina

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Listeria monoytogenes is the third most frequent cause of bacterial meningitis in adults. It commonly affects persons with defective cell-mediated immunity or advanced age, and only a few patiens with no underlying predisposition have been reported.

CASE REPORT: We presented an previously healthy, 18-year-old man with typical clinical features of meningitis. On the account of earlier treatment with ceftriaxone and cerebrospinal fluid finding, an assumption of partially treated bacterial meningitis was made. The initial treatment with vancomycin and ceftriaxone, substituted on day 4 with meropenem, did not produce any clinical effect. On day 6 Listeria monocytogenes was isolated and, even as late as that, the administration of ampicillin was followed by complete recovery of the patient.

CONCLUSION

In younger, immunocompetent individuals, in spite of the existent diagnostic and therapeutic problems, the subacute course of Listeria monocytogenes meningitis provides enough time for appropriate treatment and favorable disease outcome.

Для цитирования: Vrbić Miodrag, Dinić Marina, Jovanović Maja, Ranković Aleksandar, Popović-Dragonjić Lidija, Djordjević-Spasić Marina. Listeria monocytogenes meningitis in an immunocompetent 18-year-old patient as a possible diagnostic and therapeutical problem.. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2013. DOI: 10.2298/vsp1310976v.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.