MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724762

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1995

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in acute lumbar radiculopathy: a pilot study of the natural history.

Modic M T, Ross J S, Obuchowski N A, Browning K H, Cianflocco A J, Mazanec D J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To prospectively study clinical findings and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images over time in patients with acute lumbar radiculopathy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent physical examination and MR imaging at presentation, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Initial symptoms and clinical course were correlated with type, size, location, and enhancement of disk herniations.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients had a herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) at one or more levels, two had synovial cysts and stenosis, and five had normal findings. Patients with an HNP had marginally more severe neurologic symptoms than did patients without an HNP (P = .07) at presentation. Twenty-two patients completed the 6-week examinations and 14 patients the 6-month examinations; three patients were eliminated from the study after surgical treatment. Among HNPs larger than 6 mm, substantial reduction in size was noted in 36% at 6 weeks and in more than 60% at 6 months after presentation.

CONCLUSION

Agreement between clinical and MR findings for level and side of HNP and radicular symptoms was excellent. There was no correlation of pain and disability with disk size, behavior, or type.

Для цитирования: Modic M T, Ross J S, Obuchowski N A, Browning K H, Cianflocco A J, Mazanec D J. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in acute lumbar radiculopathy: a pilot study of the natural history.. Radiology. 1995. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724762.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.