MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182226ba6

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2012

Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Bhatia Nitin N, Lee Kenneth H, Bui Christopher N H, Luna Mario, Wahba George M, Lee Thay Q

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of a new expandable interbody cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using cadaveric lumbar spines.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: One of the popular methods of treating lumbar spine pathologies involves a posterior lumbar interbody fusion using bilateral interbody nonexpandable cages. However, this method can require extensive bony removal and nerve root retraction. Expandable interbody cages may decrease the risk associated with PLIFs.

METHODS

Biomechanical testing was performed on 5 fresh frozen L4/L5 mobile functional spinal units using a custom testing system that permits 6 df and a digital video digitizing system. The specimens were tested intact, postdiscectomy, after interbody cage placement, and after cage placement and pedicle screw fixation. Each specimen was tested from 0.5 to 8.0 N·m for extension, flexion, lateral bending, and rotation, and from 5 to 300 N for axial compression. The angular displacement, stiffness, disc height, and sagittal alignment were determined.

RESULTS

When the cage was supplemented with pedicle screw fixation, the mean angular displacement for rotation and lateral bending was significantly less than all other conditions (P < 0.05). The percentage range of motion (% ROM) showed a statistically significant decrease in lateral bending (P < 0.05) for cage alone vs. postdiscectomy. For the pedicle screw construct, rotation showed a significantly lower percentage ROM compared with all other constructs (P < 0.05), and lateral bending and extension-flexion showed a significantly lower percentage ROM compared with postdiscectomy (P < 0.05). For all motions, stiffness of the cage and pedicle screw construct was greater than intact, with only rotation showing a statistically significant increase (P < 0.05). Anterior disc height was restored to intact after cage alone (P < 0.05). Sagittal alignment did not show statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

PLIF using expandable lumbar interbody cage requires pedicle screw fixation.

Для цитирования: Bhatia Nitin N, Lee Kenneth H, Bui Christopher N H, Luna Mario, Wahba George M, Lee Thay Q. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.. Spine. 2012. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182226ba6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.