Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2012
Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty without femoral hardware removal.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The use of navigation applied to total knee arthroplasty in knees with femoral hardware retained has not been studied.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We use navigation in six patients to implant a total knee arthroplasty while retaining the femoral hardware. The retained materials were screws in two cases, diaphyseal plates in another two, intramedullary nails in one and supracondylar tube/plate in another one. Preoperative knee scores were within the 46-66 range, whereas the functional scores were within 40-68. The coronal deformity varied between 30° varus and 5° valgus.
RESULTS: The final femoral mechanical axis was between 2° valgus and 3° varus; the axis of the limb was between 4° valgus and 3° varus. Knee scores improved in all cases, with scores between 75 and 90 points (p = 0.028); functional scores were between 64 and 90 points (p = 0.043).The final range of mobility was within the 70°-110° range, with a slight improvement over the preoperative status (p = 0.042). No complications have arisen throughout the follow-up (mean 16 months).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of navigation constitutes a good option in the treatment with total arthroplasties for patients with femoral hardware retained.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We use navigation in six patients to implant a total knee arthroplasty while retaining the femoral hardware. The retained materials were screws in two cases, diaphyseal plates in another two, intramedullary nails in one and supracondylar tube/plate in another one. Preoperative knee scores were within the 46-66 range, whereas the functional scores were within 40-68. The coronal deformity varied between 30° varus and 5° valgus.
RESULTS: The final femoral mechanical axis was between 2° valgus and 3° varus; the axis of the limb was between 4° valgus and 3° varus. Knee scores improved in all cases, with scores between 75 and 90 points (p = 0.028); functional scores were between 64 and 90 points (p = 0.043).The final range of mobility was within the 70°-110° range, with a slight improvement over the preoperative status (p = 0.042). No complications have arisen throughout the follow-up (mean 16 months).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of navigation constitutes a good option in the treatment with total arthroplasties for patients with femoral hardware retained.