MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2012

Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty without femoral hardware removal.

Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The use of navigation applied to total knee arthroplasty in knees with femoral hardware retained has not been studied.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We use navigation in six patients to implant a total knee arthroplasty while retaining the femoral hardware. The retained materials were screws in two cases, diaphyseal plates in another two, intramedullary nails in one and supracondylar tube/plate in another one. Preoperative knee scores were within the 46-66 range, whereas the functional scores were within 40-68. The coronal deformity varied between 30° varus and 5° valgus.

RESULTS

The final femoral mechanical axis was between 2° valgus and 3° varus; the axis of the limb was between 4° valgus and 3° varus. Knee scores improved in all cases, with scores between 75 and 90 points (p = 0.028); functional scores were between 64 and 90 points (p = 0.043).The final range of mobility was within the 70°-110° range, with a slight improvement over the preoperative status (p = 0.042). No complications have arisen throughout the follow-up (mean 16 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of navigation constitutes a good option in the treatment with total arthroplasties for patients with femoral hardware retained.

Для цитирования: Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty without femoral hardware removal.. Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.