MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82

Медицинская библиотека · Genome biology · 2013

A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains.

Simon Michelle M, Greenaway Simon, White Jacqueline K, Fuchs Helmut, Gailus-Durner Valérie, Wells Sara, Sorg Tania, Wong Kim, Bedu Elodie, Cartwright Elizabeth J, Dacquin Romain, Djebali Sophia, Estabel Jeanne, Graw Jochen, Ingham Neil J, Jackson Ian J, Lengeling Andreas, Mandillo Silvia, Marvel Jacqueline, Meziane Hamid, Preitner Frédéric, Puk Oliver, Roux Michel, Adams David J, Atkins Sarah, Ayadi Abdel, Becker Lore, Blake Andrew, Brooker Debra, Cater Heather, Champy Marie-France, Combe Roy, Danecek Petr, di Fenza Armida, Gates Hilary, Gerdin Anna-Karin, Golini Elisabetta, Hancock John M, Hans Wolfgang, Hölter Sabine M, Hough Tertius, Jurdic Pierre, Keane Thomas M, Morgan Hugh, Müller Werner, Neff Frauke, Nicholson George, Pasche Bastian, Roberson Laura-Anne, Rozman Jan, Sanderson Mark, Santos Luis, Selloum Mohammed, Shannon Carl, Southwell Anne, Tocchini-Valentini Glauco P, Vancollie Valerie E, Westerberg Henrik, Wurst Wolfgang, Zi Min, Yalcin Binnaz, Ramirez-Solis Ramiro, Steel Karen P, Mallon Ann-Marie, de Angelis Martin Hrabě, Herault Yann, Brown Steve D M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The mouse inbred line C57BL/6J is widely used in mouse genetics and its genome has been incorporated into many genetic reference populations. More recently large initiatives such as the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC) are using the C57BL/6N mouse strain to generate null alleles for all mouse genes. Hence both strains are now widely used in mouse genetics studies. Here we perform a comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis of the two strains to identify differences that may influence their underlying genetic mechanisms.

RESULTS

We undertake genome sequence comparisons of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N to identify SNPs, indels and structural variants, with a focus on identifying all coding variants. We annotate 34 SNPs and 2 indels that distinguish C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N coding sequences, as well as 15 structural variants that overlap a gene. In parallel we assess the comparative phenotypes of the two inbred lines utilizing the EMPReSSslim phenotyping pipeline, a broad based assessment encompassing diverse biological systems. We perform additional secondary phenotyping assessments to explore other phenotype domains and to elaborate phenotype differences identified in the primary assessment. We uncover significant phenotypic differences between the two lines, replicated across multiple centers, in a number of physiological, biochemical and behavioral systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N demonstrates a range of phenotypic differences that have the potential to impact upon penetrance and expressivity of mutational effects in these strains. Moreover, the sequence variants we identify provide a set of candidate genes for the phenotypic differences observed between the two strains.

Для цитирования: Simon Michelle M, Greenaway Simon, White Jacqueline K, Fuchs Helmut, Gailus-Durner Valérie, Wells Sara, Sorg Tania, Wong Kim, Bedu Elodie, Cartwright Elizabeth J, Dacquin Romain, Djebali Sophia, Estabel Jeanne, Graw Jochen, Ingham Neil J, Jackson Ian J, Lengeling Andreas, Mandillo Silvia, Marvel Jacqueline, Meziane Hamid, Preitner Frédéric, Puk Oliver, Roux Michel, Adams David J, Atkins Sarah, Ayadi Abdel, Becker Lore, Blake Andrew, Brooker Debra, Cater Heather, Champy Marie-France, Combe Roy, Danecek Petr, di Fenza Armida, Gates Hilary, Gerdin Anna-Karin, Golini Elisabetta, Hancock John M, Hans Wolfgang, Hölter Sabine M, Hough Tertius, Jurdic Pierre, Keane Thomas M, Morgan Hugh, Müller Werner, Neff Frauke, Nicholson George, Pasche Bastian, Roberson Laura-Anne, Rozman Jan, Sanderson Mark, Santos Luis, Selloum Mohammed, Shannon Carl, Southwell Anne, Tocchini-Valentini Glauco P, Vancollie Valerie E, Westerberg Henrik, Wurst Wolfgang, Zi Min, Yalcin Binnaz, Ramirez-Solis Ramiro, Steel Karen P, Mallon Ann-Marie, de Angelis Martin Hrabě, Herault Yann, Brown Steve D M. A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains.. Genome biology. 2013. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.