European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
Analysis of the paraspinal muscle morphology of the lumbar spine using a convolutional neural network (CNN).
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baur David, Bieck Richard, Berger Johann, Neumann Juliane, Henkelmann Jeanette, Neumuth Thomas, Heyde Christoph-E, Voelker Anna
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This single-center study aimed to develop a convolutional neural network to segment multiple consecutive axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices of the lumbar spinal muscles of patients with lower back pain and automatically classify fatty muscle degeneration.
METHODS: We developed a fully connected deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a pre-trained U-Net model trained on a dataset of 3,650 axial T2-weighted MRI images from 100 patients with lower back pain. We included all qualities of MRI; the exclusion criteria were fractures, tumors, infection, or spine implants. The training was performed using k-fold cross-validation (k = 10), and performance was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and cross-sectional area error (CSA error). For clinical correlation, we used a simplified Goutallier classification (SGC) system with three classes.
RESULTS: The mean DSC was high for overall muscle (0.91) and muscle tissue segmentation (0.83) but showed deficiencies in fatty tissue segmentation (0.51). The CSA error was small for the overall muscle area of 8.42%, and fatty tissue segmentation showed a high mean CSA error of 40.74%. The SGC classification was correctly predicted in 75% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Our fully connected CNN segmented overall muscle and muscle tissue with high precision and recall, as well as good DSC values. The mean predicted SGC values of all available patient axial slices showed promising results. With an overall Error of 25%, further development is needed for clinical implementation. Larger datasets and training of other model architectures are required to segment fatty tissue more accurately.
METHODS: We developed a fully connected deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a pre-trained U-Net model trained on a dataset of 3,650 axial T2-weighted MRI images from 100 patients with lower back pain. We included all qualities of MRI; the exclusion criteria were fractures, tumors, infection, or spine implants. The training was performed using k-fold cross-validation (k = 10), and performance was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and cross-sectional area error (CSA error). For clinical correlation, we used a simplified Goutallier classification (SGC) system with three classes.
RESULTS: The mean DSC was high for overall muscle (0.91) and muscle tissue segmentation (0.83) but showed deficiencies in fatty tissue segmentation (0.51). The CSA error was small for the overall muscle area of 8.42%, and fatty tissue segmentation showed a high mean CSA error of 40.74%. The SGC classification was correctly predicted in 75% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Our fully connected CNN segmented overall muscle and muscle tissue with high precision and recall, as well as good DSC values. The mean predicted SGC values of all available patient axial slices showed promising results. With an overall Error of 25%, further development is needed for clinical implementation. Larger datasets and training of other model architectures are required to segment fatty tissue more accurately.