MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Veterinary surgery : VS · 2011

Comparison of femoral angulation measurement between radiographs and anatomic specimens across a broad range of varus conformations.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Palmer Ross H, Ikuta Courtney L, Cadmus Jill M

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: To determine if measurement of anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) from radiographs is valid across a broad range of femoral varus conformations.

STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic and anatomic study.

SAMPLE POPULATION: Large breed canine cadavers (n = 5) and femora (n = 10).

METHODS: Cadavers were held in dorsal recumbency and 8 craniocaudal radiographic projections made of each femur: 1 image pre- and postosteotomy and at each of 6 progressive levels of induced distal varus deformity. Femurs were collected. Three blinded examiners independently measured varus on each radiograph (R-aLDFA) and femoral specimen (S-aLDFA) on 3 separate occasions. Intra- and interobserver variance in R-aLDFA and S-aLDFA measurements were determined. The strength of relationship between R-aLDFA and S-aLDFA and positive and negative predictive values for R-aLDFA were calculated.

CONCLUSION: Intra- and interobserver variance in R-aLDFA (mean, 0.54% and 0.40%, respectively) and S-aLDFA (mean, 0.43% and 0.41%, respectively) were acceptable. The strength of relationship between R-aLDFA and S-aLDFA (adjusted R2 = 78.2%) was marginally below the acceptance criterion of 80%. Using aLDFA ≥ 102° as an indication for corrective femoral osteotomy, radiography was successful in correctly identifying corrective femoral osteotomy candidates (positive predictive value) and noncandidates (negative predictive value) 72% and 96% of the time, respectively.

Предметные рубрики MeSH