Neurosurgery · 2010
Comparison of allograft bone and titanium cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine: a biomechanical study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cardenas Raul J, Javalkar Vijayakumar, Patil Shashikant, Gonzalez-Cruz Jorge, Ogden Alan, Mukherjee Debi, Nanda Anil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: When an anterior approach to repair a burst fracture is indicated, several devices can be used to restore spinal stability (eg, bone graft, free-standing titanium cage, and expandable titanium cage).
OBJECTIVE: We compare the biomechanical stability and prices of each of these systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight fresh human cadaver T11 through L3 vertebral specimens were harvested and cleaned of soft tissues. T11-T12 and L2-L3 were fixed by screws. The fixed ends were then set in automotive body filler (Bondo). The prepared specimens were tested in the Biaxial Instron tester (8874, Norwood, MA) after a sequence of the following: intact, after the creation of an anterior corpectomy at L1, and after insertion of both of the 2 different titanium cages and the fibular graft. A titanium screw-and-plate anterolateral system was used to secure the construct (VANTAGE, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN). The conditions of displacement testing were as follows: rotation (+/- 3.5 degrees ), flexion and extension, and left and right bending (+/- 3.5 mm). For each mode of testing, the stiffness was calculated.
RESULTS: The stiffness data, when statistically analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (at P = .05 and power > 0.9), indicated no significant differences among these devices.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of this biomechanical study, the stiffness of the fibular graft was similar to that of the other metallic devices in this cadaver model.
OBJECTIVE: We compare the biomechanical stability and prices of each of these systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight fresh human cadaver T11 through L3 vertebral specimens were harvested and cleaned of soft tissues. T11-T12 and L2-L3 were fixed by screws. The fixed ends were then set in automotive body filler (Bondo). The prepared specimens were tested in the Biaxial Instron tester (8874, Norwood, MA) after a sequence of the following: intact, after the creation of an anterior corpectomy at L1, and after insertion of both of the 2 different titanium cages and the fibular graft. A titanium screw-and-plate anterolateral system was used to secure the construct (VANTAGE, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN). The conditions of displacement testing were as follows: rotation (+/- 3.5 degrees ), flexion and extension, and left and right bending (+/- 3.5 mm). For each mode of testing, the stiffness was calculated.
RESULTS: The stiffness data, when statistically analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (at P = .05 and power > 0.9), indicated no significant differences among these devices.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of this biomechanical study, the stiffness of the fibular graft was similar to that of the other metallic devices in this cadaver model.