MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113609

Медицинская библиотека · Injury · 2026

Chloral hydrate outperforms oral midazolam in facilitating venipuncture in children: A double-blind randomized trial.

Khakshour Ali, Akhondian Javad, Saeidinia Amin, Nirooman Shabnam

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Venipuncture for intravenous access is a frequent and distressing procedure in pediatric hospitals and trauma centers. Achieving immobility in young, anxious children is essential yet difficult. A direct comparison of commonly used sedatives for this purpose was lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To directly compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate versus midazolam for facilitating successful venipuncture in hospitalized children aged 1-5 years in emergency and trauma care.

METHODS

Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial in a tertiary hospital emergency department. One hundred children received either oral chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) or oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) 30 min before venipuncture.

PRIMARY OUTCOME: number of attempts for successful venipuncture. Secondary outcomes included sedation time, venipuncture duration, total procedural time, recovery time, satisfaction, and adverse events. Analyses were adjusted for baseline age and weight differences.

RESULTS

Chloral hydrate significantly reduced the number of venipuncture attempts (1.30 vs. 1.96; mean difference -0.66, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.40, p < 0.001). Time to adequate sedation (16.30 vs. 25.54 min), IV access time (6.80 vs. 16.74 min), and total procedural time (42.12 vs. 67.06 min) were all significantly shorter with chloral hydrate (all p < 0.001). Recovery time did not differ (p = 0.819). After adjustment for age and weight, all efficacy outcomes remained superior for chloral hydrate. Parent and nurse satisfaction were significantly higher with chloral hydrate. Safety profiles were comparable, with stable vital signs and low, similar rates of minor adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Oral chloral hydrate is significantly more effective than oral midazolam for sedating children during venipuncture in emergency and trauma settings, without compromising safety. Chloral hydrate should be considered a preferred agent for this indication.

Для цитирования: Khakshour Ali, Akhondian Javad, Saeidinia Amin, Nirooman Shabnam. Chloral hydrate outperforms oral midazolam in facilitating venipuncture in children: A double-blind randomized trial.. Injury. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113609.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.