DOI 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.05.006
Esophageal injury associated with anterior cervical spine surgery.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Anterior cervical spinal surgery has been used to treat a variety of conditions including spondylosis, fracture, tumor, infection, trauma, and instability. Esophageal perforation, a rare and unusual complication of anterior cervical procedures, has been largely relegated to only incidental case reports with few large retrospective studies performed to determine true incidence, treatment, etiology, and outcome.
METHODS
More than 3000 anterior cervical spine surgeries conducted over a 30-year period by 5 active practicing surgeons were reviewed. There were 3 cases of esophageal injury identified with subsequent critical evaluation to determine presentation, diagnosis, risk factors, management, and outcomes. In addition, incidence rates were calculated based on overall occurrence and antecedent risk factors.
RESULTS
Two of the patients with esophageal injury had predisposing risk factors, including diverticula or cervical spine trauma. The third patient had no antecedent risk factors. Symptoms included axial spine pain, odynophagia, dysphagia, purulent spondylitis, and sepsis. Treatment consisted of one or more of the following: reoperation with exploration and repair, esophageal diversion, esophageal rest, antibiotic administration, and wound drainage. Functional outcomes were achieved in all cases with no deaths.
CONCLUSIONS
Esophageal injury incidence based on overall occurrence in this study was 0.1%. Patients with no antecedent risk factors had an incidence of 0.03%. Our results compare favorably with those of the Cervical Spine Research Society survey from 1989, which predicted an incidence of 0.25% based on questionnaires filed by surgeons, representing 1 of only 2 reports that included more than 1000 patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.