DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0333521
Global trends in the proportion of macrolide-resistant Mycobacterium Species: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium species is an emerging global problem, complicating treating non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Understanding global resistance patterns is essential to improve treatment strategies and reduce morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate macrolide resistance prevalence, distribution, and trends among Mycobacterium species in different world regions.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE (2015-2023) assessed study quality using JBI guidelines. Resistance proportions were calculated with a random-effects model, and additional meta-regression and subgroup analyses explored variations and trends. Statistical analyses were conducted using R and the metafor package.
RESULTS
Out of 5,718 records, 41 studies across 17 countries were included. Azithromycin resistance was reported in 17 reports (3 Studies), with 156 resistant isolates among 715 tested, yielding a pooled rate of 29.0% (95% CI: 19.5-40.7%). Clarithromycin resistance, assessed in 76 reports (40 Studies), included 1,071 resistant isolates among 3,923 tested, with a pooled rate of 30.5% (95% CI: 23.7-38.2%). Erythromycin resistance was reported in 17 reports (3 Studies), with 350 resistant isolates among 752 tested, giving a pooled rate of 50.3% (95% CI: 37.5-62.9%). Meta-regression revealed a significant upward trend in azithromycin resistance over time (r = 0.558, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
These findings underscore the need for targeted, region- and species-specific interventions to combat rising macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium species effectively.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.