MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bot.0000000000000353

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2015

Is There an Optimal Proximal Locking Screw Length in Retrograde Intramedullary Femoral Nailing? Can We Stop Measuring for These Screws?

Collinge Cory A, Koerner John D, Yoon Richard S, Beltran Michael J, Liporace Frank A

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Insertion of locking screws through the proximal thigh while locking retrograde femoral nails is arguably more difficult and traumatic to local tissues than locking at other intramedullary nail sites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a "standard" screw length for proximal interlocking of retrograde nails is possible, therefore assessing whether the act of measuring for these screws can be omitted. This article retrospective evaluates screw position and estimated proximal locking screw length in patients undergoing retrograde nailing using a large radiographically measured computed tomography cohort, with validation through a smaller clinical cohort. According to these data, it seems reasonable to skip depth gauge measurement during anteroposterior interlocking of retrograde femoral nails and insert a standard length screw based on location relative to the lesser trochanter. This should decrease the amount of local trauma to the patient at the locking screw site while increasing operating room efficiency by avoiding what can often become a difficult step during the procedure.

Для цитирования: Collinge Cory A, Koerner John D, Yoon Richard S, Beltran Michael J, Liporace Frank A. Is There an Optimal Proximal Locking Screw Length in Retrograde Intramedullary Femoral Nailing? Can We Stop Measuring for These Screws?. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000353.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.