MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00012

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2000

Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion.

Slosar P J, Reynolds J B, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, White A H, Keaney D

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A review of 141 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented circumferential lumbar fusions. Outcome was assessed by an independent third party after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical outcomes and assess patient satisfaction with circumferential lumbar fusions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Circumferential lumbar fusion has been used as a salvage procedure for revision spine surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from patient interviews, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and review of records and radiographs of 141 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential lumbar fusion under a single anesthetic.

RESULTS

There were follow-up data in 133 of the 141 patients (92%). Mean duration of follow-up was 37.2 months. There were 41 (31%) primary and 92 (69%) revision surgeries. There were 73 (55%) workers' compensation and 60 (45%) non-workers' compensation patients. There were radiographs available at 12-month follow-up in 86 patients (65%). There was solid radiographic fusion in 85 (99%) of the 86 patients. The overall complication rate was 20%. Clinical outcome was determined by the patient satisfaction questionnaire. There were 14 (11%) who chose the statement, "surgery met my expectations"; 68 (51%) who chose, "surgery improved my condition enough that I would go through it again for the same outcome"; 26 (20%) who chose, "surgery helped me but I would not go through it again for the same outcome"; and 25 (19%) who chose, "I am the same or worse compared with before surgery." There was no statistical difference in patient satisfaction between primary and revision surgeries or between workers' compensation versus non-workers' compensation groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential lumbar fusion is a useful procedure for a patient with difficult reconstructive disease. There is a very high fusion rate. Overall, 62% of patients are satisfied with the result, especially those with a diagnosis of pseudarthrosis or spondylolisthesis with stenosis. Patients who are working before surgery and patients who are not injured workers also tended to progress well.

Для цитирования: Slosar P J, Reynolds J B, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, White A H, Keaney D. Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion.. Spine. 2000. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.