Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
Enhanced restoration of visual code after targeting ON bipolar cells compared with retinal ganglion cells with optogenetic therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodgers Jessica, Hughes Steven, Ebrahimi Aghileh S, Allen Annette E, Storchi Riccardo, Lindner Moritz, Peirson Stuart N, Badea Tudor C, Hankins Mark W, Lucas Robert J
Аннотация
Optogenetic therapy is a promising vision restoration method where light-sensitive opsins are introduced to the surviving inner retina following photoreceptor degeneration. The cell type targeted for opsin expression will likely influence the quality of restored vision. However, a like-for-like preclinical comparison of visual responses evoked following equivalent opsin expression in the two major targets, ON bipolar (ON BCs) or retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), is absent. We address this deficit by comparing stimulus-response characteristics at single-unit resolution in the retina and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of retinally degenerate mice genetically engineered to express the opsin ReaChR in Grm6- or Brn3c-expressing cells (ON BC vs. RGCs, respectively). For both targeting strategies, we find ReaChR-evoked responses have equivalent sensitivity and can encode contrast across different background irradiances. Compared with ON BCs, targeting RGCs decreased response reproducibility and resulted in more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity, and temporal frequency tuning. Recording ReaChR-driven responses in visually intact retinas confirmed that RGC-targeted ReaChR expression disrupts visual feature selectivity of individual RGCs. Our data show that, while both approaches restore visual responses with impressive fidelity, ON BC targeting produces a richer visual code closer to that of wild-type mice.