Arthritis care & research · 2020
Automated Text Message-Enhanced Monitoring Versus Routine Monitoring in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kuusalo Laura, Sokka-Isler Tuulikki, Kautiainen Hannu, Ekman Päivi, Kauppi Markku J, Pirilä Laura, Rannio Tuomas, Uutela Toini, Yli-Kerttula Timo, Puolakka Kari, SandRA Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Frequent monitoring of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is required for achieving good outcomes. This study was undertaken to investigate the influence of text message (SMS)-enhanced monitoring on early RA outcomes.
METHODS: We randomized 166 patients with early, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive RA to receive SMS-enhanced follow-up or routine care. All patients attended visits at 0, 3, and 6 months, and a follow-up visit at 12 months. Treatment was at the physicians' discretion. The intervention included 13 SMSs during weeks 0-24 with questions concerning medication problems (yes/no) and disease activity (patient global assessment [PtGA], scale 0-10). Patients were contacted if response SMSs indicated medication problems or PtGA exceeded predefined thresholds. Primary outcome was 6-month Boolean remission (no swollen or tender joints and normal C-reactive protein levels). Quality of life (QoL; measured by the Short Form 36 survey) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were assessed.
RESULTS: Six and 12-month follow-up data were available for 162 and 157 patients, respectively. In the intervention group, 46% of the patients (38 of 82) reported medication problems and 49% (40 of 82) reported text message PtGAs above the alarm limit. Remission rates at 6 months (P = 0.34) were 51% in the intervention group and 42% in the control group. These rates were 57% and 43% at 12 months (P = 0.17) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The respective mean ± SD DAS28 scores for the intervention and control groups were 1.92 ± 1.12 and 2.22 ± 1.11 at 6 months (P = 0.09); and 1.79 ± 0.91 and 2.08 ± 1.22 at 12 months (P = 0.28). No differences in QoL were observed.
CONCLUSION: The study did not meet the primary outcome despite a trend favoring the intervention group. This may be explained by the notably high overall remission rates.
METHODS: We randomized 166 patients with early, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive RA to receive SMS-enhanced follow-up or routine care. All patients attended visits at 0, 3, and 6 months, and a follow-up visit at 12 months. Treatment was at the physicians' discretion. The intervention included 13 SMSs during weeks 0-24 with questions concerning medication problems (yes/no) and disease activity (patient global assessment [PtGA], scale 0-10). Patients were contacted if response SMSs indicated medication problems or PtGA exceeded predefined thresholds. Primary outcome was 6-month Boolean remission (no swollen or tender joints and normal C-reactive protein levels). Quality of life (QoL; measured by the Short Form 36 survey) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were assessed.
RESULTS: Six and 12-month follow-up data were available for 162 and 157 patients, respectively. In the intervention group, 46% of the patients (38 of 82) reported medication problems and 49% (40 of 82) reported text message PtGAs above the alarm limit. Remission rates at 6 months (P = 0.34) were 51% in the intervention group and 42% in the control group. These rates were 57% and 43% at 12 months (P = 0.17) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The respective mean ± SD DAS28 scores for the intervention and control groups were 1.92 ± 1.12 and 2.22 ± 1.11 at 6 months (P = 0.09); and 1.79 ± 0.91 and 2.08 ± 1.22 at 12 months (P = 0.28). No differences in QoL were observed.
CONCLUSION: The study did not meet the primary outcome despite a trend favoring the intervention group. This may be explained by the notably high overall remission rates.