Negative pressure wound therapy versus gauze dressings in managing open fracture wound of lower limbs: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND

The superiority of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to standard gauze dressings for managing open fractures of the lower limbs remains controversial. This study aimed to comprehensively compare their clinical efficacy through a meta-analysis using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) alone. We hypothesized that NPWT would be more superior against infections.

METHODS

A literature search was implemented in various databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane Library, etc, to screen eligible RCTs. All included RCTs were evaluated for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. In accordance with the heterogeneity assessment, a fixed-effect or random-effect model was chosen for the data analysis.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs, including 2780 patients, were eligible for the meta-analysis. We found that patients in the NPWT group showed a lower overall infection rate (MD=0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.90, P = 0.005), acute wound infection rate (MD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.77, P = 0.009), and shorter hospital stay (MD = 24.00, 95% CI: 6.82-84.46, P < 0.00001) compared with the control group. The NPWT group showed a higher proportion of patients with wound coverage than the control group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of function score and other complications, including deep infection rate, amputation, and bone nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

From the pooled results, we suggest that NPWT may be superior than traditional gauze dressings for managing open fractures of the lower limbs.