DOI 10.3389/fpain.2026.1870255
Warming-dredging acupuncture for cancer-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES
Cancer-related pain (CRP) affects up to 60% of patients during malignancy progression, with many experiencing insufficient relief from pharmacological treatments alone. Warming-dredging acupuncture (WDA) integrates thermal and mechanical stimulation to achieve synergistic analgesic effects. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and opioid-sparing potential of WDA in managing CRP.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, and the clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) through March 9, 2026. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We used RevMan 5.4 and Stata 19.0 to analyze data, the RoB 2 tool to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE system to assess the certainty of the evidence, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD420261335674).
RESULTS
Seventeen RCTs involving 1278 participants were included. WDA significantly enhanced pain relief rates (RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.19-1.33) and reduced pain scores (MD = -1.05; 95% CI: -1.49 to -0.61) compared to controls. WDA also showed a lower risk of adverse events (RR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.26-0.46), and evidence suggested a possible reduction trend in analgesic consumption. GRADE certainty ranged from moderate to very low.
CONCLUSIONS
Warming-dredging acupuncture combined with routine pain management may offer a promising adjunct for multimodal cancer pain management, but the certainty of evidence varied across outcomes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261335674 identifier CRD420261335674.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.