The effect of thermomechanical aging on the fracture resistance of additively and subtractively manufactured polyetheretherketone abutments.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the fracture resistance (FR) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments produced by additive and subtractive methods compared to milled zirconia abutments.

METHODS

Custom abutments were designed on Ti-base abutments and produced from three different materials, namely additively manufactured PEEK (PEEK-AM), subtractively manufactured PEEK (PEEK-SM), and zirconia (N = 60). PEEK-AM abutments were printed using PEEK filaments (VESTAKEEP®i4 3DF-T, Evonik Industries AG) on a M150 Medical 3D Printer (ORION AM) by fused filament fabrication (FFF). All surface treatments were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. All abutments were cemented on Ti-bases with hybrid abutment cement and then restored with milled zirconia crowns. Each subgroup was divided into non-aged and aged subgroups (n = 10). The aged groups were subjected to thermomechanical aging (49 N, 5-55 °C, 1.2 million cycles). FR tests were performed by using an universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way and two-way ANOVA and t-test.

RESULTS

The survival rate of the specimens after aging was determined as 100%. It was found that both the material and aging had a significant effect on the FR (p<.001). There was a statistical difference among the fracture values of the groups (p<.001). In both the aged and non-aged groups, PEEK-AM showed the statistically lowest FR, while the highest FR was seen in the zirconia group, which was significantly higher than the PEEK-SM (p<.001).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid abutments were successfully manufactured, and extrusion-based processed PEEK seems to be a good alternative to subtractive processed PEEK. However, since subtractive manufacturing still appears to be superior, further developments in additive manufacturing are needed to further improve the quality of 3D-printed PEEK parts, especially in terms of accuracy and bonding between adjacent layers.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Additively manufactured PEEK abutments have the potential to be an alternative for implant-supported restorations in the posterior region.