DOI 10.1016/j.resinv.2020.10.005
Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in Asian patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: Subgroup analysis of the SENSCIS trial.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE
In the SENSCIS trial in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks by 44% in comparison with placebo, with manageable adverse events in most patients. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients of Asian race.
METHODS
Patients with SSc-ILD were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. The outcomes over 52 weeks were analyzed in Asian versus non-Asian patients.
RESULTS
Of the 288 patients in each treatment group, 62 (21.5%) in the nintedanib group and 81 (28.1%) in the placebo group were Asian; 90.2% of the Asian patients were enrolled in Asian countries. In the placebo group, the rate of FVC decline over 52 weeks was consistent between Asian and non-Asian patients (-99.9 and -90.6 mL/year, respectively). The effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of FVC decline over 52 weeks was consistent between Asian (difference, 44.3 mL/year [95% CI: -32.8, 121.4]) and non-Asian patients (difference, 39.0 mL/year [95% CI: -5.1, 83.1]) (treatment-by-time-by-subgroup interaction, p = 0.91). Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event and was reported in similar proportions of Asian and non-Asian patients in the nintedanib group (80.6% and 74.3%, respectively) and placebo group (28.4% and 32.9%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with SSc-ILD, nintedanib had a consistent benefit on slowing the progression of SSc-ILD in Asian and non-Asian patients, with a similar adverse event profile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02597933.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.