The Journal of hand surgery · 2004
Soft-tissue stabilizers of the distal radioulnar joint: an in vitro kinematic study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gofton Wade T, Gordon Karen D, Dunning Cynthia E, Johnson James A, King Graham J W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability is dependent on osseous anatomy, soft-tissue stabilizers, and muscle activity. The relative importance of DRUJ soft-tissue stabilizers remains controversial and has not been examined in the more physiologic setting of simulated muscle loading in the intact specimen. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of static stabilizers on the kinematics of the DRUJ during active simulated motion.
METHODS: Twelve cadaveric upper extremities underwent computer-controlled, simulated, active forearm rotation. Joint kinematics were measured in the intact specimen and after sequential sectioning of soft-tissue stabilizers including the dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments (RULs) and the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC), dorsal and palmar capsule, ulnocarpal ligaments (UCL), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) subsheath, pronator quadratus (PQ), and the interosseous membrane (IOM).
RESULTS: After sectioning of soft tissues significant changes in the DRUJ kinematics were observed. With a distal to proximal sectioning sequence significant alterations in kinematics were not identified until sectioning of the IOM; with a proximal to distal sectioning sequence intact DRUJ kinematics were maintained until the final soft-tissue (RULs and TFC) sectioning.
CONCLUSIONS: Sectioning of all soft-tissue stabilizers produced significant DRUJ instability and abnormal joint kinematics. The RULs and TFC play a key role in DRUJ kinematics because they can help to maintain normal joint rotation in the absence of all other soft-tissue stabilizers. With the preservation of other soft-tissue stabilizers, however, the RULs and TFC are not essential for the maintenance of normal kinematics of the DRUJ.
METHODS: Twelve cadaveric upper extremities underwent computer-controlled, simulated, active forearm rotation. Joint kinematics were measured in the intact specimen and after sequential sectioning of soft-tissue stabilizers including the dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments (RULs) and the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC), dorsal and palmar capsule, ulnocarpal ligaments (UCL), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) subsheath, pronator quadratus (PQ), and the interosseous membrane (IOM).
RESULTS: After sectioning of soft tissues significant changes in the DRUJ kinematics were observed. With a distal to proximal sectioning sequence significant alterations in kinematics were not identified until sectioning of the IOM; with a proximal to distal sectioning sequence intact DRUJ kinematics were maintained until the final soft-tissue (RULs and TFC) sectioning.
CONCLUSIONS: Sectioning of all soft-tissue stabilizers produced significant DRUJ instability and abnormal joint kinematics. The RULs and TFC play a key role in DRUJ kinematics because they can help to maintain normal joint rotation in the absence of all other soft-tissue stabilizers. With the preservation of other soft-tissue stabilizers, however, the RULs and TFC are not essential for the maintenance of normal kinematics of the DRUJ.