Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2021
Comparison and applicability of three induction methods of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in murine models.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yuan Wenxiu, Wu Yange, Zhou Xueman, Zheng Yingcheng, Wang Jun, Liu Jin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) causes severe symptoms such as chewing difficulties, acute pain and even maxillofacial deformity. However, there is hardly any effective disease-curing strategy because of uncertainty in aetiology. Animal model is an excellent tool to investigate the mechanism, prevention and treatment on diseases. Currently, although several TMJ-OA animal models have been established, there are almost no comparative studies on different models, which poses a great challenge for selecting suitable models.
OBJECTIVE: To compare three TMJ-OA induction methods and assess their applicability considering pathological changes in the cartilage, subchondral bone, osteoclasts, and synovium.
METHODS: Murine models were employed and followed for 3 and 6 weeks after experimental procedures (surgery, injection, crossbite). The TMJ changes were evaluated by Safranin-O/Fast green staining, immunofluorescence staining, micro-CT, TRAP staining, and HE staining.
RESULTS: In the Surgery group, a pronounced drop in bone volume fraction was observed. In the Injection group, chondrocytes were mostly disordered or arranged in clusters and a substantial increase in the OARSI score and osteoclasts was found. The OARSI score and osteoclasts also increased significantly in the Crossbite group, although to a lower extent compared with injection.
CONCLUSION: Osteoarthritis-like changes were observed in all models. Concerning the applicability of the different induction methods, surgery might be an important resource for the assessment of post-traumatic TMJ-OA and subchondral bone changes in early stages. Injection induces a severe end-stage osteoarthritis in a short time and provides model basis for advanced TMJ-OA. Crossbite might be more reasonable model to explore the pathogenesis mechanism of temporomandibular arthritis due to occlusal disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To compare three TMJ-OA induction methods and assess their applicability considering pathological changes in the cartilage, subchondral bone, osteoclasts, and synovium.
METHODS: Murine models were employed and followed for 3 and 6 weeks after experimental procedures (surgery, injection, crossbite). The TMJ changes were evaluated by Safranin-O/Fast green staining, immunofluorescence staining, micro-CT, TRAP staining, and HE staining.
RESULTS: In the Surgery group, a pronounced drop in bone volume fraction was observed. In the Injection group, chondrocytes were mostly disordered or arranged in clusters and a substantial increase in the OARSI score and osteoclasts was found. The OARSI score and osteoclasts also increased significantly in the Crossbite group, although to a lower extent compared with injection.
CONCLUSION: Osteoarthritis-like changes were observed in all models. Concerning the applicability of the different induction methods, surgery might be an important resource for the assessment of post-traumatic TMJ-OA and subchondral bone changes in early stages. Injection induces a severe end-stage osteoarthritis in a short time and provides model basis for advanced TMJ-OA. Crossbite might be more reasonable model to explore the pathogenesis mechanism of temporomandibular arthritis due to occlusal disorders.