Pathogenesis of bone disease in multiple myeloma: from bench to bedside.

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by malignant proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. MM-induced bone disease is a hallmark of MM; up to 80% of patients present with osteolytic bone lesions at diagnosis and have an increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with increased morbidity and mortality 1 . Approximately 60% of myeloma patients will develop a fracture during the disease course 2 . The therapeutic strategy of MM-induced bone disease includes a multimodality approach ranging from bisphosphonates and targeted therapies to local irradiation and orthopedic intervention 1 . Currently, bisphosphonates remain the gold standard treatment for myeloma bone disease 1 ; they both inhibit osteoclasts and induce MM cell apoptosis, while they exert an immunomodulatory effect on bone microenvironment 3 . Zolendronic acid is combined with novel anti-myeloma agents and reduces SREs, improves quality of life, while it prolongs both disease-free and overall survival at least in subsets of MM patients. However, adverse effects such as renal impairment and jaw osteonecrosis, as well as the unmet need of reversing bone destruction necessitate the development of novel agents 3 . Among those that are currently under investigation, denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, has demonstrated promising results 4 . The cardinal events in the pathogenesis of bone disease in MM are the increased osteoclast activity in combination with osteoblast inhibition 5 . These aspects are regulated by numerous signaling pathways. Understanding of the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of bone destruction is crucial for the effective management and the improvement of quality of life of MM patients. Thus, the aim of this review is to provide a clear insight into the underlying pathogenesis of bone disease in MM patients.

An overview of the cellular approach of MM-related bone disease

Osteoclasts and osteoblasts in normal bone metabolism

Bone remodeling constitutes a dynamic lifelong process in adults that is vital for the skeleton in order to sustain the mechanical load. Bone remodeling takes place in the basic multicellular unit (BMU), which consists of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes within the bone-remodeling cavity. Physiological bone remodeling is the result of the harmonious coupling of bone resorption and bone formation. Bone resorption is mediated by osteoclastic activity, whereas bone formation by osteoblastic activity 6 . Osteoclasts are large, multinucleated cells that are produced by the fusion of mononuclear hematopoietic stem cells derived from the monocyte–macrophage lineage (osteoclastogenesis). Mature osteoclasts bind tightly to the bone and create a sealed microenvironment where they produce enzymes that affect the organic matrix, as well as acid that degrades the mineral component. Osteoblasts are mononuclear cells derived from mesenchymal stem cells (osteoblastogenesis) and they induce bone matrix formation, collagen synthesis, osteocalcin production, and mineralization. Osteoblasts ultimately become part of the mineralized matrix and they turn into osteocytes or bone-lining cells. Normal bone remodeling is the result of the balanced crosstalk among osteoclasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, bone matrix, and immune cells that is reflected on the interrelated intracellular and extracellular molecular cascades and signaling molecules 6 . Herein, we describe the MM-induced deregulation of this process and provide rationale for future research.

The emerging role of osteocytes

Osteocytes represent ~95% of all bone cells and play a key role in bone remodeling. They are embedded within the lacuno-canalicular network, however, they communicate with cells in the bone surface and bone marrow via cytoplasmic projections. Osteocytes express factors with paracrine action such as RANKL and sclerostin that regulate both the osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity 7 .

It has been shown that the number of viable osteocytes in MM patients is reduced compared to healthy controls and this is correlated with the extent of MM-induced disease 8 . The interaction between MM cells and osteocytes activates the Notch pathway reciprocally; regarding MM cells both Notch signaling and Notch receptor expression, particularly Notch3 and Notch4, are stimulated 9 . Subsequently, RANKL/OPG ratio is increased, osteoclasts precursors are recruited and activated leading to local bone resorption. In parallel, sclerostin inhibits Wnt signaling and, consequently, osteoblast differentiation; thus it further contributes to MM-induced bone loss 9 , 10 . Interestingly, it has been recently reported that osteocyte apoptosis is crucial in modifying bone marrow local microenvironment and creating a pre-metastatic state that favors MM plasma cell homing and growth 11 . Further insight into this field might have implications in preventing bone dissemination of MM, as well as bone metastases of solid malignancies.

Regarding MM therapeutics, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has been shown to alter bone microenvironment in terms of osteocyte viability 12 . Patients treated with bortezomib had a significantly higher number of viable osteocytes compared to other MM patients. In vitro studies confirmed these results and also showed that bortezomib reduced autophagy-induced osteocytes death 12 .

Cell to cell interactions

The crosstalk between MM plasma cells and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) is critical for the induction of osteolytic disease. MM cells induce alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment and establish positive feedback vicious cycles that favor their survival 13 . BMSCs become deregulated and their differentiation into osteoblasts is impaired 14 . Both MM cells and BMSCs express cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that mediate the mutual interactions. The very late antigen 4 (VLA-4) integrin system is of particular interest; MM cells express VLA-4 (α4β1 integrin) while BMSCs express VCAM-1, which is a ligand for VLA-4. Activation of the VLA-4 integrin system is critical for MM homing and development, as well as for MM-induced bone disease 15 . When it is disrupted, bone resorption is suppressed and MM cell proliferation is suspended 16 . The adhesive interactions also activate p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38α-MAPK) that induces bone resorption and MM survival; preclinical inhibition of this pathway results in prevention of osteolytic disease and decreased tumor load 16 . Targeting cell-to-cell interactions is a promising therapeutic field that remains to be further investigated.

Molecular pathways primarily implicated in increased osteoclast activity

RANK/RANKL pathway

The receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-κB (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL) signaling pathway has been identified as a crucial regulatory system of bone remodeling. RANK is a transmembrane receptor that belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily and is expressed on the surface of osteoclast precursors. RANKL is a cytokine expressed as a membrane-bound protein by BMSCs of osteoblastic lineage and activated T-lymphocytes. The metalloprotease-disintegrin TNFα-converting enzyme mediates its cleavage into a soluble form 17 . The binding of RANKL to RANK leads to the fusion of osteoclast precursors into multinucleated cells that will ultimately become mature osteoclasts. The mature osteoclasts attach to the bone surface in order to become activated and the bone resorption process is initiated 18 . Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a member of the TNF superfamily and is secreted by BMSCs and osteoblasts. It is a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL that inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Stimuli that favor bone destruction such as 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, PTH, PTHrP, glucocorticoids, cytokines (IL-1, IL-7, TNFα), and prostaglandin E2 exert a differential effect on the aforementioned molecules by increasing RANKL and decreasing OPG expression 17 , 18 .

The deregulation of RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling pathway in MM bone disease has been well described 19 . MM cells interact with bone marrow microenvironment and activate molecular cascades that ultimately result in increased RANKL and decreased OPG expression 9 , 12 . Apart from BMSCs, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells, RANKL is overexpressed in T-lymphocytes and MM cells 20 . Soluble RANKL produced by MM cells has been implicated in the development of bone destruction in MM patients 19 , 20 . Furthermore, plasma cells also secrete PTHrP that in turn stimulates RANKL expression by osteoblasts and BMSCs via paracrine way 21 . In addition, MM cells express syndecan-1, an heparan sulfate proteoglycan, that binds to OPG. OPG is subsequently taken up by endocytosis in MM cell, where it is degraded 22 . It has been demonstrated that OPG levels are reduced in MM patients with osteolytic disease, while RANKL/OPG ratio has been proven to be an independent prognostic factor in a series of 121 newly diagnosed MM patients 23 .

The most promising agent targeting RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling pathway is the humanized monoclonal antibody denosumab. Due to its high affinity and specificity for RANKL, it can prevent RANK activation, osteoclastogenesis, and osteoclast activation. Recently, denosumab met the primary endpoint of a randomized, double blind, phase 3 study by demonstrating no inferiority compared with zolendronic acid in delaying time to first on-study SRE in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Furthermore, it was proven superior to zolendronic acid regarding time to first on-study SRE in a 15-month landmark analysis 24 . Interestingly, a PFS advantage was seen in denosumab arm; something that needs further investigation as this was an exploratory endpoint in the study 24 . Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) normalizes the deregulated bone turnover and decreases RANKL/OPG ratio 25 , whereas bortezomib-based regimens lead to normalization of bone remodeling by reducing serum RANKL levels 26 . Restoration of RANKL/OPG ratio has been also achieved via inhibition of microRNA miR-21 27 . Syndecan-1, through which myeloma cells bind, internalize and degrade OPG, is another emerging therapeutic target that could alter MM microenvironment 28 .

Notch pathway

Four transmembrane receptors (Notch 1–4) are included in the Notch family. When they bind to their ligands (Jagged 1,2 and Delta-like 1,3,4) expressed by adjacent cells, two proteolytic cleavages mediated by ADAM/TACE and γ-secretase complex are activated and the intracellular portion of Notch (ICN) is released. ICN translocates to the cell nucleus, induces transcriptional and epigenomic alterations, and ultimately activates HES-1 and C-MYC 29 .

Notch signaling pathway is actively implicated in MM-induced osteoclastogenesis 29 . Two ways of Notch pathway activation in MM have been described; MM cells express Notch 1, 2, 3 that can bind to their ligands presented either on the same cells (Jagged 1,2), namely homotypical interaction, or on adjacent BMSCs and malignant plasma cells (Jagged or Delta-like ligands), namely heterotypical interaction 30 . It has been reported that Jagged 2 deregulation in MM cells is an early phenomenon at the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) stage, while the aberrant expression of Jagged 1 coincides with the transition from MGUS to MM 29 . The net effect of Notch activation is the production of the osteoclastogenic factor RANKL by MM cells. RANKL binds to the RANK receptor on the surface of osteoclasts precursors and, in turn, Notch2 expression and activation are induced. The Notch2 signaling cascade in pre-osteoclasts may be further stimulated by binding to Jagged ligands on neighboring MM cells. BMSCs also express Notch receptors that may be triggered by Jagged ligands of MM cells and subsequently increase RANKL production 29 , 30 . Furthermore, there has been accumulating evidence indicating that Notch signaling pathway may be implicated in the establishment of a pre-metastatic milieu in the bone by triggering the expression of adhesion molecules, migratory chemokines, and angiogenetic factors and by disrupting the immune surveillance 9 , 29 . Notch pathway inhibition induces MM cell apoptosis, enhances chemosensitivity, inhibits osteoclastogenesis, and MM cell migration to the bone marrow in the preclinical setting 31 . Thus, it is a promising field for future targeted drug development.

Osteopontin

Osteopontin is a non-collagenous bone matrix glycoprotein secreted by osteoclasts and is implicated both in osteoclast activation and local angiogenesis 32 . In MM patients, osteopontin has been described as a dual marker of bone resorption and angiogenic activity; high osteopontin levels have been associated with extensive osteolytic lesions and advanced disease 33 . However, it has been reported that in a subset of MM patients with maf gene translocations, high osteopontin levels might exert a protective role on bone preservation by altering the crosstalk between MM cells and osteoclasts 34 .

CCL-3 (MIP-1α)/CCL-20

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand3 (CCL-3), previously known as macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), is a chemokine secreted by MM plasma cells and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of MM-induced bone disease 35 . Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL-20) is a chemokine involved in the Th17 pathway and is also implicated in MM osteolytic disease. CCL-20 and its receptor, CCR6, are overexpressed in the MM bone marrow niche and induce osteoclastogenesis. High levels of CCL-3/CCL-20 are detected in bone marrow and serum of MM patients and are positively correlated with the extent of bone disease and negatively associated with survival 36 , 37 . In MM human cells with translocation t(4;14), upregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 induces CCL-3 expression; thus this may be a pathway through which the cytogenetic feature mediates its adverse effect 38 . The main receptors of CCL-3 are CCR1 and CCR5, they are expressed on BMSCs, osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and MM cells, and they may have differential effects on osteolytic bone disease and MM cell migration. Due to its chemotactic action, CCL-3 attracts osteoclast precursors and induces osteoclastogenesis, while it potentiates RANKL and IL-6 effects on osteoclasts 39 . Furthermore, CCL-3 inhibits osteoblast activity by downregulating RUNX2 and osterix, as well as osteoblast mineralization 40 . CCL-3 also promotes MM cell survival and is involved in the homing process of MM cells in the bone marrow niche 41 . In preclinical studies, inhibition of CCL-3 has been effective in preventing bone destruction by impeding osteoclast function and restoring osteoblast activity, whereas the tumor burden was reduced 37 , 40 . CCR1 and CCR5 antagonists also inhibit osteoclastogenesis and MM cell adhesion to BMSCs 42 . Available biology data suggest that CCL-3 and its receptors are suitable targets for the development of novel drugs for osteoclast deregulation in myeloma patients.

Activin A

Activin A is a member of the TGFβ superfamily that binds to the type II transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptor (ActRIIA/B) that recruits and phosphorylates the type I receptor (ActRI, more commonly the activin receptor-like kinase 4 (ALK4) receptor) and a heterodimer is formed. In turn, ALK4 induces the activation of the Smad signaling cascade that results in the translocation of Smad2/3/4 complex in the nucleus, where it acts as a transcriptional factor. Apart from this canonical pathway, it has been reported that activin A is implicated in Smad-independent signaling pathways such as Akt/PI3K, MAPK/ERK, JNK, and WNT/β-catenin (non-canonical pathways) 43 . Activin A induces RANK expression and activates NF-κB pathway and, therefore promotes osteoclast differentiation 43 . Regarding bone involvement in solid malignancies, activin A has shown differential effects depending on the tumor microenvironment. Both bone marrow plasma and serum levels of activin A have been found increased in MM patients with lytic bone disease 36 , 44 , 45 . Elevated circulating activin A levels have been associated with advanced MM features and adverse prognosis 44 . Increased activin A levels have also been correlated with elevated serum periostin in newly diagnosed MM patients 46 . It has been reported that the crosstalk between BMSCs and MM cells induces activin A secretion 45 . Furthermore, activin A inhibits BMP signaling pathway in MM cell lines. Preclinical data have shown inhibition of cancer-induced bone destruction via activin A blockade 47 . In a phase II clinical study, sotatercept (ACE-011), a ligand trap fusion receptor, showed anabolic efficacy in terms of bone mineral density and bone formation 48 . The rationale for combining lenalidomide, which does not reduce activin A levels, and an activin A inhibitor has been provided, and thus a relevant clinical trial is currently ongoing 44 , 49 .

Interleukins

Interleukin 3 (IL-3) is a bifunctional cytokine that stimulates osteoclast formation and inhibits osteoblast differentiation in preclinical MM models. IL-3 induces activin A production by bone marrow macrophages and, thus, it exerts its osteoclastogenic effect 50 . The osteoblast suppression is mainly mediated by the participation of CD45 + hematopoietic cells. Elevated IL-3 levels have been detected in the bone marrow plasma of MM patients compared with healthy controls 50 . It has been reported that the primary source of IL-3 are T-lymphocytes and not MM cells, underlying the role of immune regulation in MM bone disease.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a multifunctional cytokine implicated in bone metabolism and is principally secreted by myeloid precursor cells. IL-6 enhances osteoclast differentiation, whereas it sustains MM cell survival. Additionally, it stimulates MM plasma cells to secrete vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that further activates osteoclasts by binding to their surface receptors 32 . Serum IL-6 along with matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels have been correlated with bone turnover rate in MM patients. Restoration of bone remodeling has been provided with anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibodies and these results are investigated in clinical trials 51 . Interestingly, IL-6 levels have been reduced with DKK1 inhibition 52 . IL-6 also stimulates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, that in turn regulates IL-6, VEGF and osteopontin expression. A dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor decreased osteoclast function and increased osteoblast formation in a preclinical setting and, therefore, it may be effective in bone disease in the clinical setting as well 5 .

Interleukin 17 (IL-17) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is mainly secreted by T-helper cells (Th17) along with other T-lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells. In preclinical MM models, IL-17 promotes osteoclast activation and induces osteolytic lesions 52 . An anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody (AIN 457) has shown positive results in preclinical studies by inhibiting MM growth and survival and downregulating osteoclast cell number 53 .

TNF superfamily

TNF-alpha (TNF-α) is a signaling cytokine that is elevated in MM patients and is involved in the pathogenesis of MM bone disease. TNF-α acts synergistically with RANKL and induces osteoclastogenesis 54 .

B cell-activating factor (BAFF) is a member of TNF superfamily that is secreted by BMSCs, osteoclasts, and MM cells. MM patients present with increased serum BAFF levels; BAFF binds to its receptor and the net downstream effect is the activation of NF-κB that promotes MM cell survival 55 . In a preclinical model, BAFF inactivation via a monoclonal antibody resulted in decreased osteoclastogenesis and improved survival 56 . Furthermore, BAFF expression had a prognostic value in myeloma patients; however, the addition of a monoclonal anti-BAFF antibody, tabalumab, to bortezomib plus dexamethasone did not increase PFS compared to placebo in a phase 2 study 57 .

BTK and SDF-1α

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase of the TEC family and is principally implicated in B cell receptor signaling pathway and osteoclast differentiation 58 . Stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) is a chemokine that mediates the migration and homing of myeloma cells and induces osteoclast activity after binding to CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) 59 . BTK is expressed in MM cells and it is positively correlated with CXCR4 expression 58 . Osteoclast precursors expressing BTK and CXCR4 migrate towards SDF-1α and, in turn, SDF-1α induces BTK activation in MM cells 58 . SDF-1α/CXCR4 pathway has been described as an important regulator of MM cell homing and it constitutes a promising therapeutic target 59 . BTK inhibition in preclinical models has reversed the adverse effects of osteoclast overactivation 58 . Ibrutinib, a selective BTK inhibitor, suppresses bone resorption by counteracting osteoclastic activity and inhibiting chemokine and cytokine secretion from BMSCs and osteoclasts 60 . Ibrutinib efficacy on MM and MM-induced bone disease is currently investigated in the clinical trial era.

Annexin II

Annexin II (Annexin A2) is a calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding member of the annexin family and is expressed by endothelial cells, BMSCs, mononuclear macrophages, and malignant cells. Annexin II is upregulated in MM patients and in MM cell lines and stimulates MM cell adhesion and growth, angiogenesis, osteoblastic mineralization, osteoclastogenesis 5 , 61 . Annexin II is secreted both by MM plasma cells and BMSCs, osteoblasts and osteoclasts 61 . In the clinical setting, elevated annexin II expression is associated with adverse prognostic features 61 . Annexin II constitutes a promising targetable factor affecting bone remodeling in MM.

PU.1

PU.1 is a transcriptional factor that is essential for osteoclast formation, as well as for myeloid and B-lymphoid cells. Immunomodulatory anti-MM agents (IMiDS) downregulate PU.1 and, thus, they inhibit osteoclastogenesis and they are effective against MM-induced bone disease 62 , 63 .

Molecular pathways primarily implicated in suppressed osteoblast activity

WNT pathway

Wingless and integration-1 (WNT) signaling pathway is another molecular cascade involved in the pathogenesis of bone disease in MM patients 17 , 19 . When the WNT pathway is activated, the canonical WNT ligands bind to the WNT co-receptors LRP5/6 and one transmembrane receptor of the FDZ family. Subsequently, a complex that includes disheveled (DVL), Axin, FRAT1, and GSK-3β is created. In turn, β-catenin of the cytoplasm is able to translocate to the nucleus where it activates the T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) transcription factors that ultimately result in gene expression favoring bone formation and impeding bone resorption. PTH binding to PTH1 receptor may also activate this pathway in the absence of WNT ligands. Furthermore, the non-canonical WNT–planar cell polarity (WNT–PCP) pathway is initiated by the formation of WNT ligand–receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2) or the receptor-like tyrosine kinase (RYK)–FZD–DVL complex and consists of three distinct cascades: the Disheveled-associated activator of morphogenesis 1 (DAAM1)–RHO–RHO-associated kinase (ROCK) pathway, the RAC–Jun kinase (JNK)–RUNX2 pathway and the WNT–Ca 2+ pathway 64 . In preclinical MM models in vivo, it has been shown that increased WNT signaling affects the bone marrow microenvironment and prevents the development of myeloma bone disease 65 .

Interestingly, WNT–β-catenin pathway is also implicated in cell cycle promotion as well as in cell–cell interactions. Aberrant WNT signaling has been reported to contribute to the proliferation of MM cells, despite the absence of relevant identifiable mutations as in solid malignancies. This implies the role of bone marrow niche in sustaining WNT signaling and the increased sensitivity of MM plasma cells to autocrine and paracrine WNT signals 66 . Importantly, it has been suggested that members of the WNT family favor the migration and invasion of myeloma plasma cells through the non-canonical WNT pathway as well 67 . This pathway is also implicated in the adhesion-mediated drug resistance of MM cells 68 . Inhibition of the deregulated WNT pathway is a promising target with encouraging results in preclinical studies 66 . WNT pathway inhibitors such as sclerostin, Dickkopf-1, and sFRP-2/3 seem to be elevated and induce bone resorption by preventing β-catenin translocation to the nucleus 69 .

Sclerostin

Sclerostin is a cysteine knot-containing protein, produced by osteocytes, resulting from the transcription of the SOST gene. Sclerostin induces the apoptosis of mature osteoblasts by activating the caspase pathway and inhibits osteoblast-driven bone formation 70 . Sclerostin antagonizes the activation of the canonical WNT pathway by binding to the extracellular domain of LRP5/6 transmembrane receptors that are found on osteoblast-lineage cells 70 . Thus, WNT ligands cannot bind to LRP5/6, DVL–Axin–FRAT1–GSK-3β complex is not formed and GSK-3β phosphorylates β-catenin. B-catenin subsequently undergoes proteasomal degradation via ubiquitination. Inside the nucleus, TCF/LEF transcription factors are repressed by Groucho and gene expression promoting bone formation is suspended 64 . Furthermore, sclerostin, alone or in conjunction with noggin, prevents type I and type II bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) from binding to their receptors and, thus, the BMP-mediated mineralization in osteoblasts is downregulated 71 . It has been shown that sclerostin is secreted by MM cells derived from the bone marrow of MM patients 72 . Sclerostin suppresses bone formation by inhibiting the osteoblastogenesis and the mineralization process, while it stimulates osteoclastogenesis by augmenting RANKL/OPG ratio 73 . Interestingly, elevated circulating sclerostin levels have been found in MM patients compared to patients with MGUS 74 . MM patients presented with fracture at diagnosis had higher levels of circulating sclerostin, as well as those with International Staging System (ISS)-3 disease 74 . High levels of sclerostin have been described even in the plateau phase of disease course 75 . Elevated circulating sclerostin has been proposed as an adverse prognostic factor in MM patients 74 . Sclerostin is a potential therapeutic target of monoclonal antibodies. Romosozumab, a humanized anti-sclerostin antibody, has been proven effective in restoring bone remodeling in benign bone disorders 4 . The rationale for a similar approach in MM has been provided by preclinical studies, especially by combining anti-sclerostin antibodies with antitumor drugs such as proteasome inhibitors 10 .

Dickkopf-1

Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) is a member of the DKK family that antagonizes the WNT pathway and plays an important role in osteoblastogenesis and skeletal development 69 . DKK1 binds to LRP5/6 in combination with the Kremen1/2 transmembrane proteins and forms a complex that induces the internalization of LRP; thus, the activation of the canonical WNT/β-catenin pathway is inhibited 76 . DKK1 has emerged as a key modulator of bone disease in MM 69 . It inhibits osteoblastogenesis since it prevents BMSCs from differentiating into mature osteoblasts by suspending the autocrine WNT signaling that is necessary for the BMP-2-mediated osteoblast differentiation 77 . In turn, the undifferentiated BMSCs secrete interleukin-6 (IL-6) that stimulates the proliferation of MM plasma cells secreting DKK1 78 . DKK1 acts synergistically with sclerostin and results in osteoblast dysfunction 64 . Furthermore, DKK1 deregulates the RANKL and OPG production that is mediated by WNT pathway in osteoblasts resulting in an increase of RANKL/OPG ratio; thus, osteoclastogenesis is indirectly stimulated 79 . Elevated serum and bone marrow DKK1 levels are associated with the presence of lytic bone lesions in MM patients 36 . A positive correlation between DKK1 levels and the amount of osteolytic lesions has been also described 77 . Genomic studies have shown that increased expression of DKK1 gene is associated with myeloma-induced bone disease 80 . Importantly, high DKK1 expression is a predictor of early SRE incidence even in patients on bisphosphonate treatment 81 . Successful anti-myeloma treatment, including bortezomib-based regimens, immunomodulatory (IMiDS) agents or ASCT, is associated with normalization of bone remodeling that is mediated, at least in part, by reduced serum DKK1 levels 26 , 82 . These results have provided the rationale for developing DKK1 neutralizing antibodies, such as BHQ880 that induces osteoblast differentiation and inhibits myeloma cell growth via alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment 83 . In a phase II clinical trial including patients with high risk smoldering MM, it demonstrated increased bone anabolic activity 84 . Interestingly, targeting DKK1 may also have important implications in the immunotherapy of MM patients, as active vaccination of murine MM models with DKK1-DNA vaccine was effective in preventing MM development and reducing tumor burden in mice with established MM 85 .

Periostin

Periostin, also known as osteoblast-specific factor, is a disulfide-linked cell adhesion protein that belongs to the fasciclin family and it is produced by BMSCs. It is expressed in the periosteum as a response to mechanical load and it is implicated in cell migration of bone-remodeling cells. Periostin is expressed during osteoclast differentiation in vitro, as well as in the early phases of osteoblast differentiation, whereas it decreases during mineralization stage. For this reason, it has been suggested as a potential marker of new bone formation 86 . Periostin is a multifaceted molecule; it acts as a structural component of the bone matrix, while it is also implicated in the WNT-signaling pathway and it activates the integrin–AKT–FAK–β-catenin pathway 87 . Periostin is implicated in several forms of cancer and MM by promoting tumor growth and metastasis. Both newly diagnosed and relapsed patients present with elevated levels of periostin in bone marrow plasma and in serum compared to SMM, MGUS, and healthy controls. High periostin levels are also associated with extensive bone lytic lesions, bone fractures and advanced disease characteristics 46 . Interestingly, monoclonal antibodies targeting periostin have emerged with promising results in preclinical models of breast and ovarian cancer 88 ; nevertheless, their role in MM pathogenesis remains to be investigated.

RUNX2, GFI1, and IL-7

Runt-related transcription factor 2/core-binding factor Runt domain subunit 1 (RUNX2/CBFA1) is part of the non-canonical WNT-signaling pathway and constitutes a critical regulator of osteoblastogenesis. MM cells inhibit RUNX2 activity in BMSCs and osteoblast precursor cells and, therefore, they impede osteoblast differentiation 14 . Indeed, MM patients with osteolytic disease have reduced number of RUNX2-positive osteoblasts and stromal cells in their bone marrow biopsies compared with those without bone lesions 14 . Recently, cysteine-rich 61 (CYR61/CCN1) protein, that is secreted in the bone marrow microenvironment, has been identified as a stimulator of osteoblast differentiation by upregulating RUNX2 in MM preclinical studies 89 . However, it has been shown that MM cells also overexpress RUNX2 and higher levels are associated with advanced disease characteristics and poor prognosis. RUNX2 induces the Akt/β-catenin/survivin pathway along with the transcriptional activation of a gene panel that facilitate the homing of MM cells into the bone niche 90 . RUNX2 is also a major regulator of osteopontin, as previously discussed.

Growth factor independence-1 (GFI1) is a transcriptional repressor that binds to RUNX2 and decreases its expression. BMSCs derived either from MM patients or MM-bearing mice have shown increased levels of GFI1 91 . Importantly, anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-7 antibodies suppress GFI1 activity, whereas siRNA knockdown of GFI1 restores RUNX2 levels 91 . Therefore, GFI1 is a promising target in MM bone disease. Moreover, GFI1 recruits histone deacetylases and other epigenetic modifiers to the RUNX2 promoter; inhibition of these molecules has emerged as a feasible way of reversing the long-term suppression of osteoblast activity in MM 92 .

Interleukin 7 (IL-7) downregulates RUNX2 transcriptional activity and, thus, it inhibits osteoblast differentiation 14 . Moreover, IL-7 stimulates T-lymphocytes to secrete RANKL 20 . Increased IL-7 levels have been found in bone marrow plasma of MM patients 20 . IL-7 is also involved in the RUNX2-mediated osteoblast suppression by inducing GFI1 91 . Overall, targeting RUNX2, GFI1, and IL-7 might have encouraging results in overcoming MM-induced bone destruction.

TGFβ and BMPs

Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) is produced in an inactive form by osteocytes and osteoblasts in bone matrix and it is activated by osteoclasts during bone resorption 93 . Similar to periostin, TGFβ has been suggested as a potential marker of bone formation 86 . Deregulation of TGFβ pathway is implicated in cancer-induced bone disease. TGFβ induces arrest of terminal BMSCs differentiation in MM microenvironment. Importantly, TGFβ inhibition restores terminal osteoblast differentiation and suppresses MM cell growth 93 . Thus, targeting TGFβ could be a significant therapeutic potential in the future.

BMPs are included in the TGFβ superfamily and act through Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways. BMP-2 induces osteoblastogenesis and promotes bone formation 94 . MM cells overexpress hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and Pim-2 kinase; both of them have been described as negative regulators of BMP-mediated osteoblast differentiation 95 .

TNF superfamily

Apart from its role in promoting osteoclastogenesis, TNF-α inhibits osteoblast precursor recruitment from progenitor cells and suppresses RUNX2 and its transcriptional co-activator, TAZ, as well as osterix; resulting to osteoblast differentiation 91 .

LIGHT is another member of TNF superfamily that binds to the membrane-bound TNF signaling receptors, HVEM and lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTβR), and activates the TNF-receptor-associated-factor cascade that ultimately alters gene expression 96 . In patients with MM bone disease, LIGHT is secreted by immune cells including CD14+monocytes, CD8+ T cells, and neutrophils. LIGHT decreases osteoblastogenesis by inhibiting the formation of osteoblast precursors, osteocalcin and collagen I as well as by inducing sclerostin expression by monocytes. In parallel, LIGHT favors osteoclast differentiation by acting synergistically with RANKL and activating the Akt, NFκB and JNK signaling pathways 96 . Anti-LIGHT monoclonal antibodies might restore the deregulated bone metabolism.

EphrinB2/EphB4 signaling pathway

The Eph receptors are tyrosine kinase receptors that are activated by ligands called ephrins (Eph receptor-interacting proteins) and their bidirectional counteracting function plays a substantial role in bone metabolism. EphrinB2 is expressed in osteoclasts and is induced by PTH, while EphB4 is expressed in osteoblasts and BMSCs 97 . EphrinB2/EphB4 binding results in two signaling cascades; the forward signaling that favors osteoblast differentiation by downregulating RhoA and the reverse signaling that inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing Fos and Nfatc1 transcription 97 . Both EphrinB2 and EphB4 expression is decreased in BMSCs of MM patients. Decreased WNT signaling in MM may reduce EphB4 expression by osteoblasts. Chimeric EphrinB2-Fc-activated EphB4 in BMSCs and EphB4-Fc-stimulated EphrinB2 activation in osteoclasts. The administration of these agents in murine MM models resulted in enhancement of bone formation indices 98 . Thus, targeting EphrinB2/EphB4 signaling pathway could reverse the pathogenesis of bone disease in MM.

Adiponectin

Adiponectin constitutes an adipocyte-derived hormone that is also expressed by osteoblasts and BMSCs. Both osteoblasts and osteoclasts express adiponectin receptors, and adiponectin exerts its effect on bone remodeling through autocrine/paracrine and endocrine pathways. The direct pathway by circulating adiponectin is inhibitory, while all the others are stimulatory 99 . In a murine MM model, adiponectin deficiency was associated with bone disease and increased tumor load, whereas pharmacologic stimulation of adiponectin secretion prevented MM-induced bone lesions and resulted in prolongation of survival 100 . The crosstalk between adipocytes and MM cells remains currently under investigation.

Conclusion

Pathogenesis of bone disease in MM constitutes a multifaceted entity that includes several intracellular and intercellular signaling pathways (Fig. 1 ). Molecular pathways such as RANK/RANKL/OPG, Notch, Wnt, RUNX2, EphrinB2/EphB4, and TNF pathway, as well as signaling molecules including DKK1, sclerostin, periostin, osteopontin, GFI1, BMPs, TGFβ, activin A, annexin II, adiponectin, BTK, SDF1a, chemokines, and interleukins, are at the spotlight of current MM research (Table 1 ). Despite the current evidence regarding the uncoupling of the remodeling process, the crosstalk among the regulators of bone turnover is only partially understood. However, targeting key factors implicated in MM-induced bone disease has been fruitful; denosumab has shown no inferiority compared to zolendronic acid in a phase III clinical trial. However, we need not only to target osteoclasts but also to enhance osteoblast function and target osteocytes as well. Therefore, preclinical research along with clinical trials investigating bone-related outcomes are deemed indispensable to improve the management of bone disease in MM patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Terpos E, et al. International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:2347–2357. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.7901.

2. Terpos E, Berenson J, Cook RJ, Lipton A, Coleman RE. Prognostic variables for survival and skeletal complications in patients with multiple myeloma osteolytic bone disease. Leukemia. 2010;24:1043–1049. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.62.

3. Terpos E, Roodman GD, Dimopoulos MA. Optimal use of bisphosphonates in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2013;121:3325–3328. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-435750.

4. Gavriatopoulou M, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Terpos E. Emerging treatment approaches for myeloma-related bone disease. Expert. Rev. Hematol. 2017;10:217–228. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1283213.

5. Terpos E, Berenson J, Raje N, Roodman GD. Management of bone disease in multiple myeloma. Expert. Rev. Hematol. 2014;7:113–125. doi: 10.1586/17474086.2013.874943.

6. Xiao W, Wang Y, Pacios S, Li S, Graves DT. Cellular and molecular aspects of bone remodeling. Front. Oral. Biol. 2016;18:9–16. doi: 10.1159/000351895.

7. Nakashima T, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1231–1234. doi: 10.1038/nm.2452.

8. Giuliani N, et al. Increased osteocyte death in multiple myeloma patients: role in myeloma-induced osteoclast formation. Leukemia. 2012;26:1391–1401. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.381.

9. Delgado-Calle J, et al. Bidirectional notch signaling and osteocyte-derived factors in the bone marrow microenvironment promote tumor cell proliferation and bone destruction in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1089–1100. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1703.

10. Delgado-Calle J, et al. Genetic sost deletion and pharmacological inhibition of sclerostin prevent multiple myeloma-induced bone loss without affecting tumor growth. Blood. 2016;128:1136. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.152.

11. Trotter TN, et al. Osteocyte apoptosis attracts myeloma cells to bone and supports progression through regulation of the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2016;128:484.

12. Toscani D, et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib maintains osteocyte viability in multiple myeloma patients by reducing both apoptosis and autophagy: a new function for proteasome inhibitors. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:815–827. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2741.

13. Noll JE, et al. Myeloma plasma cells alter the bone marrow microenvironment by stimulating the proliferation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Haematologica. 2014;99:163–171. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.090977.

14. Giuliani N, et al. Myeloma cells block RUNX2/CBFA1 activity in human bone marrow osteoblast progenitors and inhibit osteoblast formation and differentiation. Blood. 2005;106:2472–2483. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4986.

15. Mori Y, et al. Anti-alpha4 integrin antibody suppresses the development of multiple myeloma and associated osteoclastic osteolysis. Blood. 2004;104:2149–2154. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0236.

16. Vanderkerken K, et al. Inhibition of p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase prevents the development of osteolytic bone disease, reduces tumor burden, and increases survival in murine models of multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4572–4577. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4361.

17. Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA. Interaction between the skeletal and immune systems in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2011;60:305–317. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-0974-x.

18. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature01658.

19. Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA. Myeloma bone disease: pathophysiology and management. Ann. Oncol. 2005;16:1223–1231. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi235.

20. Giuliani N, et al. Human myeloma cells stimulate the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) in T lymphocytes: a potential role in multiple myeloma bone disease. Blood. 2002;100:4615–4621. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1121.

21. Cafforio P, et al. PTHrP produced by myeloma plasma cells regulates their survival and pro-osteoclast activity for bone disease progression. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:55–66. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2022.

22. Standal T, et al. Osteoprotegerin is bound, internalized, and degraded by multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2002;100:3002–3007. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1190.

23. Terpos E, et al. Soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand-osteoprotegerin ratio predicts survival in multiple myeloma: proposal for a novel prognostic index. Blood. 2003;102:1064–1069. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0380.

24. Terpos E, et al. Comparison of denosumab with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone disease in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma; an international, randomized, double blind trial. Haematologica. 2017;102(S2):S782.

25. Terpos E, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation normalizes abnormal bone remodeling and sRANKL/osteoprotegerin ratio in patients with multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2004;18:1420–1426. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403423.

26. Terpos E, et al. Bortezomib reduces serum dickkopf-1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand concentrations and normalises indices of bone remodelling in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2006;135:688–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06356.x.

27. Pitari MR, et al. Inhibition of miR-21 restores RANKL/OPG ratio in multiple myeloma-derived bone marrow stromal cells and impairs the resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts. Oncotarget. 2015;6:27343–27358. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4398.

28. Yang Y, et al. The syndecan-1 heparan sulfate proteoglycan is a viable target for myeloma therapy. Blood. 2007;110:2041–2048. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-082495.

29. Colombo M, et al. Notch-directed microenvironment reprogramming in myeloma: a single path to multiple outcomes. Leukemia. 2013;27:1009–1018. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.6.

30. Houde C, et al. Overexpression of the NOTCH ligand JAG2 in malignant plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients and cell lines. Blood. 2004;104:3697–3704. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4114.

31. Mirandola L, et al. Anti-Notch treatment prevents multiple myeloma cells localization to the bone marrow via the chemokine system CXCR4/SDF-1. Leukemia. 2013;27:1558–1566. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.27.

32. Tanaka Y, et al. Myeloma cell-osteoclast interaction enhances angiogenesis together with bone resorption: a role for vascular endothelial cell growth factor and osteopontin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:816–823. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2258.

33. Saeki Y, et al. Enhanced production of osteopontin in multiple myeloma: clinical and pathogenic implications. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;123:263–270. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04589.x.

34. Robbiani DF, et al. Osteopontin dysregulation and lytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Hematol. Oncol. 2007;25:16–20. doi: 10.1002/hon.803.

35. Terpos E, Politou M, Viniou N, Rahemtulla A. Significance of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1alpha) in multiple myeloma. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2005;46:1699–1707. doi: 10.1080/10428190500175049.

36. Palma BD, et al. Osteolytic lesions, cytogenetic features and bone marrow levels of cytokines and chemokines in multiple myeloma patients: Role of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20. Leukemia. 2016;30:409–416. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.259.

37. Terpos E, et al. Serum levels of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1alpha) correlate with the extent of bone disease and survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;123:106–109. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04561.x.

38. Masih-Khan E, et al. MIP-1alpha (CCL3) is a downstream target of FGFR3 and RAS-MAPK signaling in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108:3465–3471. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-017087.

39. Oyajobi BO, et al. Dual effects of macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha on osteolysis and tumor burden in the murine 5TGM1 model of myeloma bone disease. Blood. 2003;102:311–319. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3905.

40. Fu R, et al. Osteoblast inhibition by chemokine cytokine ligand3 in myeloma-induced bone disease. Cancer Cell. Int. 2014;14:132. doi: 10.1186/s12935-014-0132-6.

41. Lentzsch S, et al. Macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP-1 alpha) triggers migration and signaling cascades mediating survival and proliferation in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Blood. 2003;101:3568–3573. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2383.

42. Vallet S, et al. MLN3897, a novel CCR1 inhibitor, impairs osteoclastogenesis and inhibits the interaction of multiple myeloma cells and osteoclasts. Blood. 2007;110:3744–3752. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-093294.

43. Sugatani T, Alvarez UM, Hruska KA. Activin A stimulates IkappaB-alpha/NFkappaB and RANK expression for osteoclast differentiation, but not AKT survival pathway in osteoclast precursors. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003;90:59–67. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10613.

44. Terpos E, et al. Circulating activin-A is elevated in patients with advanced multiple myeloma and correlates with extensive bone involvement and inferior survival; no alterations post-lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy. Ann. Oncol. 2012;23:2681–2686. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds068.

45. Vallet S, et al. Activin A promotes multiple myeloma-induced osteolysis and is a promising target for myeloma bone disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Usa. 2010;107:5124–5129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911929107.

46. Terpos E, et al. High levels of periostin correlate with increased fracture rate, diffuse MRI pattern, abnormal bone remodeling and advanced disease stage in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6:e482. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2016.90.

47. Chantry AD, et al. Inhibiting activin-A signaling stimulates bone formation and prevents cancer-induced bone destruction in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010;25:2633–2646. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.142.

48. Abdulkadyrov KM, et al. Sotatercept in patients with osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2014;165:814–823. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12835.

49. Scullen T, et al. Lenalidomide in combination with an activin A-neutralizing antibody: preclinical rationale for a novel anti-myeloma strategy. Leukemia. 2013;27:1715–1721. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.50.

50. Lee JW, et al. IL-3 expression by myeloma cells increases both osteoclast formation and growth of myeloma cells. Blood. 2004;103:2308–2315. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-1992.

51. Fulciniti M, et al. A high-affinity fully human anti-IL-6 mAb, 1339, for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:7144–7152. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1483.

52. Noonan K, et al. A novel role of IL-17-producing lymphocytes in mediating lytic bone disease in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116:3554–3563. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-283895.

53. Prabhala RH, et al. Targeting IL-17A in multiple myeloma: a potential novel therapeutic approach in myeloma. Leukemia. 2016;30:379–389. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.228.

54. Lam J, et al. TNF-alpha induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J. Clin. Invest. 2000;106:1481–1488. doi: 10.1172/JCI11176.

55. Hengeveld PJ, Kersten MJ. B-cell activating factor in the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma: a target for therapy? Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e282. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.3.

56. Neri P, et al. Neutralizing B-cell activating factor antibody improves survival and inhibits osteoclastogenesis in a severe combined immunodeficient human multiple myeloma model. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:5903–5909. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0753.

57. Raje NS, et al. Phase 2 study of tabalumab, a human anti-B-cell activating factor antibody, with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2017;176:783–795. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14483.

58. Bam R, et al. Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in myeloma cell migration and induction of bone disease. Am. J. Hematol. 2013;88:463–471. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23433.

59. Alsayed Y, et al. Mechanisms of regulation of CXCR4/SDF-1 (CXCL12)-dependent migration and homing in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2007;109:2708–2717. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035857.

60. Tai YT, et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition is a novel therapeutic strategy targeting tumor in the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120:1877–1887. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-396853.

61. Seckinger A, et al. Clinical and prognostic role of annexin A2 in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120:1087–1094. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-415588.

62. Anderson G, et al. Thalidomide derivative CC-4047 inhibits osteoclast formation by down-regulation of PU.1. Blood. 2006;107:3098–3105. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3450.

63. Breitkreutz I, et al. Lenalidomide inhibits osteoclastogenesis, survival factors and bone-remodeling markers in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2008;22:1925–1932. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.174.

64. Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat. Med. 2013;19:179–192. doi: 10.1038/nm.3074.

65. Qiang YW, Shaughnessy JD, Jr., Yaccoby S. Wnt3a signaling within bone inhibits multiple myeloma bone disease and tumor growth. Blood. 2008;112:374–382. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-120253.

66. van Andel H, et al. Aberrantly expressed LGR4 empowers Wnt signaling in multiple myeloma by hijacking osteoblast-derived R-spondins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:376–381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618650114.

67. Qiang YW, et al. Wnts induce migration and invasion of myeloma plasma cells. Blood. 2005;106:1786–1793. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0049.

68. Kobune M, et al. Wnt3/RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway is involved in adhesion-mediated drug resistance of multiple myeloma in an autocrine mechanism. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007;6:1774–1784. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0684.

69. Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Dickkopf-1: a suitable target for the management of myeloma bone disease. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets. 2009;13:839–848. doi: 10.1517/14728220903025770.

70. Sutherland MK, et al. Sclerostin promotes the apoptosis of human osteoblastic cells: a novel regulation of bone formation. Bone. 2004;35:828–835. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.05.023.

71. Winkler DG, et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J. 2003;22:6267–6276. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg599.

72. Brunetti G, et al. Sclerostin is overexpressed by plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1237:19–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06196.x.

73. Colucci S, et al. Myeloma cells suppress osteoblasts through sclerostin secretion. Blood Cancer J. 2011;1:e27. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2011.22.

74. Terpos E, et al. Elevated circulating sclerostin correlates with advanced disease features and abnormal bone remodeling in symptomatic myeloma: reduction post-bortezomib monotherapy. Int. J. Cancer. 2012;131:1466–1471. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27342.

75. Terpos E, et al. Circulating levels of the Wnt inhibitors Dickkopf-1 and sclerostin in different phases of multiple myeloma: alterations post-therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib. Blood. 2010;116:2963.

76. Mao B, et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2002;417:664–667. doi: 10.1038/nature756.

77. Tian E, et al. The role of the Wnt-signaling antagonist DKK1 in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:2483–2494. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030847.

78. Gunn WG, et al. A crosstalk between myeloma cells and marrow stromal cells stimulates production of DKK1 and interleukin-6: a potential role in the development of lytic bone disease and tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Stem Cells. 2006;24:986–991. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0220.

79. Qiang YW, et al. Myeloma-derived Dickkopf-1 disrupts Wnt-regulated osteoprotegerin and RANKL production by osteoblasts: a potential mechanism underlying osteolytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;112:196–207. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-132134.

80. Durie BG, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of EPHX1, Gsk3beta, TNFSF8 and myeloma cell DKK-1 expression linked to bone disease in myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23:1913–1919. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.129.

81. Wu P, et al. A gene expression-based predictor for myeloma patients at high risk of developing bone disease on bisphosphonate treatment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:6347–6355. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0994.

82. Politou MC, et al. Serum concentrations of Dickkopf-1 protein are increased in patients with multiple myeloma and reduced after autologous stem cell transplantation. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119:1728–1731. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22033.

83. Fulciniti M, et al. Anti-DKK1 mAb (BHQ880) as a potential therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2009;114:371–379. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-11-191577.

84. Munshi NC, et al. Early evidence of anabolic bone activity of BHQ880, a fully human anti-DKK1 neutralizing antibody: results of a phase 2 study in previously untreated patients with smoldering multiple myeloma at risk for progression. Blood. 2012;120:331.

85. Qian J, et al. Active vaccination with Dickkopf-1 induces protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity in murine multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;119:161–169. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-368472.

86. Merle B, Bouet G, Rousseau JC, Bertholon C, Garnero P. Periostin and transforming growth factor beta-induced protein (TGFbetaIp) are both expressed by osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Cell. Biol. Int. 2014;38:398–404. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10219.

87. Bonnet N, Garnero P, Ferrari S. Periostin action in bone. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016;432:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.12.014.

88. Field S, et al. Novel highly specific anti-periostin antibodies uncover the functional importance of the fascilin 1-1 domain and highlight preferential expression of periostin in aggressive breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2016;138:1959–1970. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29946.

89. Liu H, et al. CYR61/CCN1 stimulates proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro and contributes to bone remodeling in vivo in myeloma bone disease. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;50:631–639. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3815.

90. Trotter TN, et al. Myeloma cell-derived Runx2 promotes myeloma progression in bone. Blood. 2015;125:3598–3608. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-613968.

91. D’Souza S, et al. Gfi1 expressed in bone marrow stromal cells is a novel osteoblast suppressor in patients with multiple myeloma bone disease. Blood. 2011;118:6871–6880. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-346775.

92. Adamik J, et al. EZH2 or HDAC1 inhibition reverses multiple myeloma-induced epigenetic suppression of osteoblast differentiation. Mol. Cancer Res. 2017;15:405–417. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0242-T.

93. Takeuchi K, et al. Tgf-Beta inhibition restores terminal osteoblast differentiation to suppress myeloma growth. PLoS. ONE. 2010;5:e9870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009870.

94. Ryoo HM, Lee MH, Kim YJ. Critical molecular switches involved in BMP-2-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells. Gene. 2006;366:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.011.

95. Standal T, et al. HGF inhibits BMP-induced osteoblastogenesis: possible implications for the bone disease of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2007;109:3024–3030. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034884.

96. Brunetti G, et al. LIGHT/TNFSF14 increases osteoclastogenesis and decreases osteoblastogenesis in multiple myeloma-bone disease. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12950–12967. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2633.

97. Zhao C, et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell. Metab. 2006;4:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012.

98. Pennisi A, et al. The ephrinB2/EphB4 axis is dysregulated in osteoprogenitors from myeloma patients and its activation affects myeloma bone disease and tumor growth. Blood. 2009;114:1803–1812. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-201954.

99. Shinoda Y, et al. Regulation of bone formation by adiponectin through autocrine/paracrine and endocrine pathways. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006;99:196–208. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20890.

100. Fowler JA, et al. Host-derived adiponectin is tumor-suppressive and a novel therapeutic target for multiple myeloma and the associated bone disease. Blood. 2011;118:5872–5882. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330407.