Early recognition and bundle-based management of pediatric sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric sepsis is a high-stakes, time-sensitive emergency, yet early recognition in the emergency department (ED) remains inconsistent because presenting features are heterogeneous, early signs are nonspecific, and implementation capacity varies across hospitals. At the same time, evidence for bundle-based care has expanded, but important clinical questions remain regarding which recognition approaches are most reliable in frontline ED settings, which bundle elements are best supported, and why pathway uptake remains uneven. This narrative review was undertaken to address these questions and to clarify current evidence gaps relevant to pediatric emergency practice.

METHODS

This structured narrative review searched PubMed on March 15, 2026 for studies published from January 1, 2010 through March 15, 2026 using terms related to pediatric sepsis, emergency care, screening, early recognition, sepsis bundles, biomarkers, quality improvement, and digital decision support. We focused on ED-relevant studies addressing recognition strategies, bundle implementation, nursing or workflow processes, and emerging technologies. Titles and abstracts were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the final literature set was synthesized thematically into recognition, management, implementation, and future-direction domains. No language filter was planned at search design, but the review was limited to studies with accessible English full-text data for analysis.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Current evidence supports a layered ED recognition model that combines clinical assessment with structured screening, targeted biomarkers, and workflow-integrated digital support rather than reliance on any single tool. Evidence is strongest for bundle pathways improving process outcomes such as time to antibiotics, pathway activation, and compliance with first-hour care targets. By contrast, evidence for direct mortality benefit, stand-alone biomarker superiority, and routine use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems remains promising but inconsistent because studies are heterogeneous in definitions, populations, and implementation context. The literature also shows that success in general ED practice depends heavily on pediatric readiness, nursing-led escalation, local workflow design, and multidisciplinary coordination.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric sepsis care in the ED should be organized around rapid recognition plus measurable, context-adapted bundle delivery. The clearest evidence gaps involve external validation of recognition tools in general EDs, more explicit evaluation of individual bundle components, harmonized operational definitions and bundle metrics, and implementation studies that test how digital support and nursing workflows can improve frontline performance.