MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.025

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of arthroplasty · 2017

Comparison of an Uncemented Tapered Stem Design in Cobalt-Chrome vs Titanium at 15-Year Follow-Up.

Fernández-Fernández Ricardo, Martínez-Miranda Jesus M, Gil-Garay Enrique

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and titanium (Ti) have been the most popular materials employed for cementless implants. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological results of a single stem design with both alloys at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive uncemented stems implanted in 171 patients (100 Co-Cr and 100 Ti implants) between 1999 and 2002 were studied. Mean age of the patients was 60.9 years (range, 20-84). Clinical results were evaluated using the Harris hip score. The presence of thigh pain was also analyzed. Stem fixation was graded according to Engh criteria. Radiolucent lines, osteolysis, and stem subsidence were also analyzed.

RESULTS

At 15-year follow-up, no stems had been revised. Both groups showed similar clinical results with mean Harris hip score of 93.4 (Co-Cr) vs 93.9 (Ti). There was no difference in the rate of thigh pain (11 vs 8.3, respectively, P = .507). Radiolucent lines were more frequent in the Co-Cr group (63.6% vs 35.6%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ti stems showed better osteointegration than Co-Cr stems, with a significantly lower incidence of radiolucent lines. However, this did not affect the clinical results or the appearance of thigh pain.

Для цитирования: Fernández-Fernández Ricardo, Martínez-Miranda Jesus M, Gil-Garay Enrique. Comparison of an Uncemented Tapered Stem Design in Cobalt-Chrome vs Titanium at 15-Year Follow-Up.. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.