MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218558

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020

Genomic Risk Score impact on susceptibility to systemic sclerosis.

Bossini-Castillo Lara, Villanueva-Martin Gonzalo, Kerick Martin, Acosta-Herrera Marialbert, López-Isac Elena, Simeón Carmen P, Ortego-Centeno Norberto, Assassi Shervin, International SSc Group, Australian Scleroderma Interest Group (ASIG), PRECISESADS Clinical Consortium, PRECISESADS Flow Cytometry study group, Hunzelmann Nicolas, Gabrielli Armando, de Vries-Bouwstra J K, Allanore Yannick, Fonseca Carmen, Denton Christopher P, Radstake Timothy Rdj, Alarcón-Riquelme Marta Eugenia, Beretta Lorenzo, Mayes Maureen D, Martin Javier

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Genomic Risk Scores (GRS) successfully demonstrated the ability of genetics to identify those individuals at high risk for complex traits including immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aimed to test the performance of GRS in the prediction of risk for systemic sclerosis (SSc) for the first time.

METHODS

Allelic effects were obtained from the largest SSc Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) to date (9 095 SSc and 17 584 healthy controls with European ancestry). The best-fitting GRS was identified under the additive model in an independent cohort that comprised 400 patients with SSc and 571 controls. Additionally, GRS for clinical subtypes (limited cutaneous SSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc) and serological subtypes (anti-topoisomerase positive (ATA+) and anti-centromere positive (ACA+)) were generated. We combined the estimated GRS with demographic and immunological parameters in a multivariate generalised linear model.

RESULTS

The best-fitting SSc GRS included 33 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and discriminated between patients with SSc and controls (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC)=0.673). Moreover, the GRS differentiated between SSc and other IMIDs, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome. Finally, the combination of GRS with age and immune cell counts significantly increased the performance of the model (AUC=0.787). While the SSc GRS was not able to discriminate between ATA+ and ACA+ patients (AUC<0.5), the serological subtype GRS, which was based on the allelic effects observed for the comparison between ACA+ and ATA+ patients, reached an AUC=0.693.

CONCLUSIONS

GRS was successfully implemented in SSc. The model discriminated between patients with SSc and controls or other IMIDs, confirming the potential of GRS to support early and differential diagnosis for SSc.

Для цитирования: Bossini-Castillo Lara, Villanueva-Martin Gonzalo, Kerick Martin, Acosta-Herrera Marialbert, López-Isac Elena, Simeón Carmen P, Ortego-Centeno Norberto, Assassi Shervin, International SSc Group, Australian Scleroderma Interest Group (ASIG), PRECISESADS Clinical Consortium, PRECISESADS Flow Cytometry study group, Hunzelmann Nicolas, Gabrielli Armando, de Vries-Bouwstra J K, Allanore Yannick, Fonseca Carmen, Denton Christopher P, Radstake Timothy Rdj, Alarcón-Riquelme Marta Eugenia, Beretta Lorenzo, Mayes Maureen D, Martin Javier. Genomic Risk Score impact on susceptibility to systemic sclerosis.. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2020. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218558.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.