Single versus double plating for bicondylar tibia plateau fractures: Comparison of range of motion, muscle strength, clinical outcomes and accelerometer-measured physical activity levels.

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of bicondylar plateau fractures is still a matter of debate. Accelerometer-measured physical activity levels may help us to obtain objective information regarding the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to compare the physical activity levels, objective and subjective functional results and stabilities of fixations of patients with treated bicondylar plateau fractures.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study of 23 patients, accelerometer-measured physical activity levels, daily energy consumption and measurements of knee joint range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength were measured. While Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used as a patient-reported outcome measurement, Rasmussen Radiological Score was used for radiological evaluation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of physical activity levels and daily energy consumption (P = 0.667). While Total KOOS, Symptom and Stiffness and Sports Activities scores were higher in patients with a single plate (P = 0.034, P = 0.003 and P = 0.014, respectively), knee flexion and extension ROM and flexor and extensor muscle strength were similar between groups (P = 0.405, P = 0.095, P = 0.982 and P = 0.988, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

While patient-reported outcome measurements were better with single plating, there was no difference between the groups in terms of physical activity levels, ROM, muscle strength and radiological results. Although it should be kept in mind that the choice of the primary surgeon, the condition of the soft tissue and the fracture geometry are also effective in the decision-making process, single plating seems to be a valid surgical option in the treatment of bicondylar plateau fractures.