Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2024
Scoping review to compare the sphygmomanometer and pressure biofeedback unit in assessing core muscle strength.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sharma Riya, Singh Gurjant, Kothiyal Saumya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A strong core is a key to stability, posture, and strength. To reduce back pain and improve functional movement deep abdominal muscles are targeted. Use a sphygmomanometer for reliable, objective core muscle strength and stability measurements based on the resistance applied. A pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) can provide feedback on core muscle function, helping to enhance lumbopelvic stability and overall core function.
METHODS: A study compared two devices in assessing core strength. Electronic databases like PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant articles. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening process to identify studies that met the required criteria.
RESULTS: The review includes 22 studies comparing a sphygmomanometer and a pressure biofeedback unit in core muscle strength. A sphygmomanometer provides core strength and stability, but pressure biofeedback improves lumbopelvic stability and core muscle function.
CONCLUSION: The study found that the sphygmomanometer is reliable and effective in measuring core muscle strength. It targeted deep abdominal muscles, reduce low back pain and improve functional activity.
METHODS: A study compared two devices in assessing core strength. Electronic databases like PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant articles. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening process to identify studies that met the required criteria.
RESULTS: The review includes 22 studies comparing a sphygmomanometer and a pressure biofeedback unit in core muscle strength. A sphygmomanometer provides core strength and stability, but pressure biofeedback improves lumbopelvic stability and core muscle function.
CONCLUSION: The study found that the sphygmomanometer is reliable and effective in measuring core muscle strength. It targeted deep abdominal muscles, reduce low back pain and improve functional activity.