MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.03.002

Медицинская библиотека · Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2014

Evaluation of treatment for camptodactyly: retrospective analysis on 40 fingers.

Almeida Saulo Fontes, Monteiro Anderson Vieira, Lanes Rúbia Carla da Silva

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

to retrospectively assess the results from cases treated in the hand surgery service, starting from a preestablished protocol; and to conduct a critical analysis on the results achieved, with separation of the cases into their respective subgroups.

METHODS

twenty-three patients and a total of 40 fingers were evaluated between January 2004 and December 2011. We correlated the altered anatomical structures found in the cases that underwent the surgical procedure and its results, with regard to both conservative and surgical treatment, emphasizing the main indications.

RESULTS

the results were analyzed using the Sierget method of the Mayo Clinic.

CONCLUSION

we observed that the cases of camptodactyly of the little finger alone in the flexible form (>60°) that underwent surgical treatment uniformly presented excellent results. In the rigid forms, our observations indicated that there were benefits comprising gains of extension and correction of the deformity. However, the range of motion with active flexion in the proximal interphalangeal joint was always partial. With evolution over time, some cases presented some loss of the gain previously achieved, which corroborates the need for continual vigilance during the follow-up, with systematic use of braces until the final phase of skeletal growth.

Для цитирования: Almeida Saulo Fontes, Monteiro Anderson Vieira, Lanes Rúbia Carla da Silva. Evaluation of treatment for camptodactyly: retrospective analysis on 40 fingers.. Revista brasileira de ortopedia. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.03.002.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.