Comparison of 2 Types of Local Anesthetic Techniques in the Reduction of Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

The treatment of distal radius fractures may require manipulation of the fracture assisted by finger traction, causing pain both at the fracture site and at the fingers. The usual type of anesthesia used does not anesthetize the fingers.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study with two groups, hematoma block (HB) and hematoma with associated median nerve block (MHB). Characteristic variables of the patients were collected. The main variable for the analysis was pain, measured using the Visual Analogical Scale (VAS). It was measured prior to the injection (VAS1), during fracture reduction (VAS2), and 30 minutes after the injection (VAS3) in both groups.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 140 fractures (70 anesthetized with HB), 78% were women. There were no significant differences in the variables age, sex, Elixhauser index. and need for surgery between the groups. In the HB group, the VAS means were VAS1 5.23 cm (SD 2.31), VAS2 5.80 cm (SD 2.52), and VAS3 1.89 cm (SD 1.94); while in the MHB group, VAS1 5.13 cm (SD 2.36), VAS2 3.15 cm (SD 1.70), and VAS3 1.09 cm (SD 1.38). Area of greatest pain during fracture reduction in the HB group was finger traction in 78% cases (p < .05), while in the MHB group it was the manipulation of the fracture site in 71% cases (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that the use of hematoma with associated median nerve block decreases pain perception in patients with distal radius fracture that needs closed reduction, when compared to HB alone.