MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10195-008-0019-1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2008

Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a Polarus humeral nail.

Koike Yoichi, Komatsuda Tatsuro, Sato Katsumi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures occur frequently. Displaced or unstable fractures require open reduction and internal fixation. Our objective was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of the internal fixation using Polarus humeral nails for fractures of the proximal humerus.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

From January 2001 to April 2006, 54 shoulders of 54 patients (44 females, 10 males) underwent the intramedullary fixation using Polarus humeral nail. Mean age of the patients was 66-year-old (39-89) at the time of the surgery. Fracture-type by Neer classification was 2-part (29 shoulders), 3-part (22 shoulders) and 4-part (3 shoulders). The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

All the shoulders after osteosynthesis obtained bone-union. There was no osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Functional outcome measured by JOA score averaged 81 points. Totally 43 patients (79%) had satisfactory to excellent results. Varus deformity was seen in 4 shoulders (8%) and the deformity of the greater tuberosity in 4 (8%).

CONCLUSION

The Polarus intramedullary humeral nail is effective for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Для цитирования: Koike Yoichi, Komatsuda Tatsuro, Sato Katsumi. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a Polarus humeral nail.. Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-008-0019-1.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.