DOI 10.1007/s00784-020-03756-w
Mandibular asymmetry as a possible etiopathologic factor in temporomandibular disorder: a prospective cohort of 134 patients.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The present study aimed to investigate mandibular asymmetry as a possible etiopathologic factor in temporomandibular disorder (TMD).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A prospective cross-sectional study of patients with dentofacial deformities seeking corrective orthognathic surgery was conducted. The pre-operative prevalence of TMD in patients with mandibular asymmetry and other dentofacial deformities was assessed using the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) Axis I protocol.
RESULTS
A total of 134 patients were recruited - 82 with mandibular asymmetry and 52 without. There was a significantly higher prevalence of TMD in those with mandibular asymmetry (67.1%; 95% CI 59 to 75%) compared to those without (40.4%; 95% CI 32 to 49%, p = 0.002). The overall pre-operative prevalence of TMD in this population of patients was 56.7% (95% CI 48 to 65%). Pain disorder only was present in 9.7%, TMJ disorder only in 29.9%, and both pain and TMJ disorders in 17.2%. The most prevalent type of TMD is disc displacement with reduction (77.6%), followed by myalgia (35.5%) and arthralgia (21.1%).
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of TMD in those with mandibular asymmetry was significantly higher than those without, suggesting that mandibular asymmetry could be a possible etiopathologic factor in TMD.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significantly higher prevalence of temporomandibular disorder in those with mandibular asymmetry suggests that we need to be especially cognizant of this condition in our pre-operative, surgical, and post-operative management of this group of orthognathic patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.