High-volume surgeons in regard to reductions in operating time, blood loss, and postoperative complications for total hip arthroplasty.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to clarify the volume-outcome relations for total hip arthroplasty, with a particular focus on outcome variables such as operating time, blood loss, and postoperative complications.
METHODS
Using an Internet-based questionnaire survey, we identified 2965 total hip arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis, idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head, rheumatoid arthritis, or hip fractures in 289 hospitals in Japan during the period from November 1, 2006, to March 31, 2007. We examined the hospital and surgeon volumes, patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, drug history, co-morbid conditions), details of the surgical procedures, and outcome variables (operating time, blood loss, postoperative complications). Multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the relations between the outcome variables and hospital/surgeon volumes, adjusting for patient characteristics and surgical details.
RESULTS
The average operating time was 114 +/- 62 min. The average blood loss was 429 +/- 347 ml. The postoperative complication rate was 6.1%. Surgeon volume (> or = 500 cases) was inversely associated with operating time (odds ratio 0.20; P < 0.01), blood loss (odds ratio 0.54; P = 0.02), and postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.53; P = 0.01). Hospital volume was not significantly associated with any of the outcome variables examined.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study indicates that surgeon volume is a significant predictor of better outcomes after total hip arthroplasty.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.